“The Increasing dependence on the state is anything but a healthy symptom, it means the whole nation is in a fair way to becoming a herd of sheep, constantly relying on a shepherd to drive them into good pastures. The Shepherds staff soon becomes a rod of iron, and the shepherds into wolves…
Anyone who still possesses the instinct of self-preservation knows perfectly well that only a swindler would try to relieve him of responsibility…those who promise everything are sure to fulfil nothing, and everyone who promises too much is in danger of using evil means to carry out his promises…”
Carl Jung; Civilization in Transition
WHY TOXIC PERSONS DESPISE THOSE WHO ARE GOOD:
The video below “Why are EMPATHS often disliked and disrespected” is very inspirational and should motivate those who are feeling powerless. You do not have to be an Empath to benefit from this excellent, motivational video from Where EMPATHY and ART collide By Vitalgermaine
Communications between John Barwell from Legal Lens and myself, suddenly stopped at the end of last year. I waited and observed, but I believe it is probably as a result of ‘the snakes’ doing what they do best; interfere from BEHIND THE SCENES to prevent communications between anyone with a platform/knowledge; warning others about the Dangers of Being Led by Fake leaders etc. It was good whilst it lasted; but the traitors in government & co, work extremely hard to cause divisions in society to serve their dangerous agendas. I hope John and his family are safe & well.
10/06/26 See further down below and on this website page; dated March 19 2025 “THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPON AGAINST INSTITUTIONAL DECAY, IS PERSISTENT UNFLINCHING TRANSPARENCY.” and what it has recently changed into at Legal Lens https://legallens.org.uk/the-whistleblowers-gambit-one-womans-crusade-against-institutional-rot/ which appears to have multiple disclaimers/amendments throughout all the newest version of the legal Lens website:
Updated 16/06/26
I have just noticed alterations on the Legal Lens website – which strongly indicates that it has been compromised. I was given permission to use whatever sections of that website written by John Barwell – and did so; throughout my own. Having revisited some of these original pages they too have been – dramatically changed. The only alternative for this would be is that I have been a victim of an elaborate gaslighting scam by the state-sponsored ‘techy’ persons – in the hope my own website is also discredited, so I would spend my time removing the posts – and less time on exposing the unscrupulous persons – who have the means motive and opportunity to scam & abuse everyone – which is another reason we should not trust any of authorities or their sycophants. I will keep the original posts in position until I decide what to do with them.
51Intimidation, etc., of witnesses, jurors and others.
[F1(1)A person commits an offence if—
(a)he does an act which intimidates, and is intended to intimidate, another person (“the victim”),
(b)he does the act knowing or believing that the victim is assisting in the investigation of an offence or is a witness or potential witness or a juror or potential juror in proceedings for an offence, and
(c)he does it intending thereby to cause the investigation or the course of justice to be obstructed, perverted or interfered with.
(2)A person commits an offence if—
(a)he does an act which harms, and is intended to harm, another person or, intending to cause another person to fear harm, he threatens to do an act which would harm that other person,
(b)he does or threatens to do the act knowing or believing that the person harmed or threatened to be harmed (“the victim”), or some other person, has assisted in an investigation into an offence or has given evidence or particular evidence in proceedings for an offence, or has acted as a juror or concurred in a particular verdict in proceedings for an offence, and
(c)he does or threatens to do it because of that knowledge or belief.
(3)For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2) it is immaterial that the act is or would be done, or that the threat is made—
(a)otherwise than in the presence of the victim, or
(b)to a person other than the victim.]
(4)The harm that may be done or threatened may be financial as well as physical (whether to the person or a person’s property) and similarly as respects an intimidatory act which consists of threats.
Updated 13/06/26 I have started removing many of the Legal Lens articles as they have altered too much and because I had not been able to contact John Barwell about the articles [on another of my email addresses – which does not appear to work either!] – which are mainly AI generated – This is all highly suspicious!
N.B. No-one acknowledges my website or my emails etc these days, and most attempts at communications from me to anyone else are either blocked or their responses are. The reason they want to shut up ‘whistleblowers’ permanently, is because we are a serious threat to their credibility/integrity – by exposing so much about them. They will do anything to avoid accountability, especially jail time; by using influence and position. Just like any other organised crime network. I am a ‘lone wolf’ where my website is concerned – because I do not ask others to support me financially.
I have never lied and have repeatedly tried to go through legal process to hold the subjects on my website – to account, but I was deliberately prevented from doing so. The authorities [or their complicit enablers] would not last long in any uncorrupted court with a genuinely independent jury. So they have to engage in dirty tactics from behind the scenes. They have had over 7 yrs to accuse me of fraud, as I have accused them, yet they have not done so – just attempted to bully/intimidate me whenever they can: “Having heard all of this you may choose to look the other way but you can never again say you did not know” speech by William Wilberforce & more via https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/William_Wilberforce
“Sir, the nature and all the circumstances of this trade are now laid open to us; we can no longer plead ignorance, we can not evade it; it is now an object placed before us, we can not pass it; we may spurn it, we may kick it out of our way, but we can not turn aside so as to avoid seeing it; for it is bro directly before our eyes that this House must decide, and must justify to all the world, and to their own consciences, the rectitude of the grounds and principles of their decision.”
- “On the Horrors of the Slave Trade“, speech delivered in the House of Commons (12 May 1789).
Yet all our fake leaders want to run the world with them as masters and the rest of us as their slaves – fully dependent on them for everything, as I have evidenced throughout my website.
13/06/26 I built this page around the Legal Lens website – and original pages are no longer available, although I have saved copies of many of the original pages, which now demonstrate the site has almost completely, been edited again – which is highly suspicious. Therefore I am having to remove all versions from my website pages – which will take me some time. I will leave the testimonial seen below, by the author named John Barwell which was sent to me; so it can be compared with the newest/altered version. I do not even know if the whole website or John Barwell is real [but he was connected to LinkedIn, and other social platforms, when I originally searched] – was all just an elaborate scam or he has been silenced by threats!
Previously….19/03/25 It gives me great pleasure to announce that I have discovered another trustworthy ally of the public : John Barwell, the founder of Legal Lens website:
“At Legal Lens, we are committed to empowering Litigants in Person (LiPs) by providing transparent and insightful analysis on law and ethics. Founded by John Barwell, Legal Lens was born out of a passion to expose the failures of the legal system and support those often left to face these challenges alone.
Mission Statement
Our mission is to hold power accountable, inspire legal reform, and enhance public understanding of the law. John Barwell’s personal journey and extensive experience in IT, law, and ethics drive our commitment to delivering valuable content that supports individuals, particularly LiPs, in making informed decisions.
Contact Legal Lens – Law and Ethics
Have questions or need more insights? We’re here to engage with you and provide the guidance you need.” Please take a look and bookmark the site for quick access to informed support and advice. You will not regret it.
John has very graciously written an article about my website with a direct link to mine. I cannot express in words how grateful I am for his support. 🔽 Below is the article which can be found on the Legal Lens website which John wrote to summarise what I have been hoping to achieve. We share the view that the key to be successful in defending ourselves, is to stand firm; armed with conclusive evidence, additional knowledge from reliable sources and a relentless commitment to bring about positive change. Those who can demonstrate integrity will win against the charlatans, who can only engage in more duplicitous actions to avoid accountability.
The Whistleblower’s Gambit: One Woman’s Crusade Against Institutional Rot
Written by John Barwell 18 March 2025
In the labyrinthine world of British bureaucracy, where power often whispers more loudly than justice speaks, Pamela stands as a rather unexpected David to an array of institutional Goliaths. Her weapon? A meticulously crafted website that pulls back the curtain on systemic misconduct with the precision of a surgeon’s scalpel.
The Unlikely Catalyst
Picture, if you will, a quiet residential street where a neighbourly dispute would typically simmer down over a cup of tea. Not so for Pamela. Her intervention on behalf of a neighbour against Caledonia Housing Association became a Kafkaesque journey that would make even the most hardened civil servant wince.
The result? A personal exodus that would make most retreat. Instead, Pamela did something rather remarkable: she began to document.
A History of Institutional Sleight of Hand
Her battle wasn’t newfound. Years earlier, she’d encountered a more personal form of institutional manipulation when her former father-in-law—armed with resources and influence—managed to engineer a council decision that separated her from her infant son. The kind of manoeuvre that would be dismissed as conspiracy theory, were it not so devastatingly documented.
Do Not Trust Them: More Than a Website, A Manifesto
What emerged wasn’t a bitter screed, but a forensically constructed platform. Do Not Trust Them is less a complaint box and more an intricate map of institutional failure. Each page reads like evidence laid bare, each narrative a carefully constructed argument against systemic opacity.
The Resistance
Predictably, the institutions in her crosshairs haven’t taken kindly to such scrutiny. Attempts to silence or discredit have been met with a resolve that can only be described as quintessentially British: polite, unrelenting, and armed with paperwork.
Why It Matters
In an era where institutional trust is as fragile as a politician’s promise, Pamela represents something profound: the individual’s capacity to challenge systemic dysfunction. Her work isn’t just personal—it’s a public service.
“When dishonesty begets dishonesty,” she writes, “unethical behaviour is rewarded, but decency is treated with contempt.”
It’s the kind of line that would make a parliamentary committee squirm.
A Note of Caution
For those tempted to dismiss her as a lone voice, consider this: every significant institutional reform began with someone willing to say, “No, this is not acceptable.”
Curious souls and fellow truth-seekers can delve deeper at Do Not Trust Them
Postscript
“In the grand tradition of British reporting—part expose, part understated outrage—Pamela’s work reminds us that the most powerful weapon against institutional decay is persistent, unflinching transparency. Checkmate, bureaucracy.”
Posted in Regulatory Matters, Whistleblowing and Public Interest Tagged activism, bureaucracy, censorship, government accountability, institutional corruption, justice, Transparency, truth vs power, UK politics, whistleblower
Post navigation
Investigatory Powers Tribunal: Oversight of Surveillance and Secret Powers
Ch.2 “THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPON AGAINST INSTITUTIONAL DECAY, IS PERSISTENT UNFLINCHING TRANSPARENCY.”
Frédéric Bastiat – The Law – Academy of Ideas
16/08/25 Under the guise of deterring those who may wish to use companies for illegal purposes ( but only what authority criminals will ACKNOWLEDGE as being illegal) they are engaging in another unnecessary general; power /data grab/abuse by abusing their positions. The govts already illegally share any of our data from banks, companies etc amongst themselves and other ‘friends of govt’ therefore facilitating ID theft etc & they collect/promote dishonest persons along the way.
🔼🔼🔼changestoukcompanylaw.campaign.gov.uk refused to connect… because they hate my website for exposing those in power [the snakes who commit the most serious crimes themselves], are now apparently, denying me access to recent govt docs! That is fine, I already have exposed enough about their corruption in positions of office as do others💪💪💪 – including those I have shared information with – many years ago!
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/misconduct-public-office
We need to show them – who need the most scrutiny and immediate accountability for the mountain of crimes they have already committed & for deterrent purposes – LOCK THEM UP!
“Companies House will introduce a new identity verification process to help deter those wishing to use companies for illegal purposes.
Anyone setting up, running, owning or controlling a company in the UK will need to verify their identity to prove they are who they claim to be. Read the guidance on verifying your identity for Companies House.
Who needs to verify their identity
From 8 April 2025, individuals can voluntarily verify their identity. You can verify directly with Companies House through GOV.UK One Login, or through an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP).
From 18 November 2025, identity verification will be required for:
- new directors and people with significant control (PSCs)
- existing directors and PSCs
- members of a limited liability partnership (LLP)
We’ll introduce identity verification at a later date for:
- people who file at Companies House
- limited partnerships
- corporate directors of companies
- corporate members of LLPs
- officers of corporate PSCs ”
In Scotland, corruption greatly assists those in positions of trust – who wish to avoid accountability, and who have access to public cash or via illegally obtained assets. The individual members of the public trying to defend themselves; would have great difficulty in finding anyone who is not corrupted – from the police – right to the top of the Justice system.
COPS CASH TO LAWYERS: Scotland’s single Police Service name Law firms who were paid TWENTY FOUR million pounds – during last Three years of Iain Livingstone’s term as Police Scotland Chief Monday, December 11, 2023 from The Justice Diaries
“The solution of the social problem is in liberty” – Frederic Bastiat
We need to make the decisions concerning our well being and that of our children – and no longer rely on those who refuse to work in our best interest. Instead, we should free ourselves from those who have already harmed so many.
“The real cost of the State is the prosperity we do not see, the jobs that don’t exist, the technologies to which we do not have access, the businesses that do not come into existence, and the bright future that is stolen from us. The State has looted us just as surely as a robber who enters our home at night and steals all that we love.” – Frédéric Bastiat
SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME STRATEGY 2023 TO 2028
CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME
Ch.2 CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME.
Page updated 07/07/25 Asset Laundering In The UK | Crime Under The Crown | The Corruption Capital of the World Video by Moconomy.
“Politically Exposed Persons…someone who holds a public function and as a result, presents a higher risk of being involved in bribery and corruption…” …and the evidence of this type of corruption; designed to Pervert the Course Of Justice; is especially rife amongst those who operate in the echelons of power.
Q. So, when is the law, not the law❓ A. When it is not fit for purpose – because the decision makers are on the wrong side of the law.
Example: Throughout the UK: Designed to Fail – The Continuing Travesty of the Horizon Scandal by Professor Tim Wilson. “…This is a pattern. These scandals are not isolated blunders. They reveal a deeper pathology within our political and administrative culture…”
04/07/25 Did Parliament Just Change What MPs Do? by Craig Houston.
02/07/25 Please pay ATTENTION to this: Our politicians; enjoy making up & altering rules and laws to further their own criminal actions – and now have sneaked in a massive change in their job description. LET US DEMAND THE REMOVAL OF ALL THESE SELF-SERVING, PARISITIC CRIMINALS – NOW! Use their phone contact numbers and alert all the press/ social platforms/ regulators/ police and everywhere you can think of to bombard them with complaints and outrage. Provide a list of all the reasons they should be removed. Cause them chaos – for a change!
Now they boast: “What do MPs do?
”MPs work both at the UK Parliament and in their local constituencies. How and where they work is largely up to them to decide. There is no job description or contract of employment for MPs, nor any rules on how they should balance the competing demands of these two roles. However, MPs must abide by standards of conduct, rules and conventions. For more information see Accountability and Standards.
How an MP decides to divide their time can depend upon the schedule of business in the House of Commons, the distance of their constituency from London, their family responsibilities, or whether they have taken on additional responsibilities in the Commons or in the government.
If an MP has taken on an extra role in the House of Commons (such as a committee chair) or in government (such as a ministerial role), they may need to spend more time at Westminster particularly when the House is sitting.
MPs employ a small number of staff to assist with work at Parliament and help to run offices in the constituency. This allows work to continue in both settings while the MP travels between the two.
MPs at Parliament
In Parliament, MPs are expected to carry out the core work of the House of Commons:
- Legislation and taxation – examining and approving new laws or taxes
- Scrutiny – holding the government to account for its actions
- Debating – where competing viewpoints can be expressed and the concerns of constituents can be raised
Find out more at: What is the role of Parliament?
Although each MP is sent from one local area, at Parliament they may also consider the best interests of the entire nation.
MPs carry out their parliamentary work in the debating chambers and committee rooms of the House of Commons, and in their parliamentary offices. Apart from formal parliamentary events, MPs can attend private meetings during each week at Parliament. These may be meetings with representatives from industry, trade unions, campaigners, and lobbyists. They may also attend party meetings and meetings arranged by All-Party Parliamentary Groups.
MPs in their constituency
In their constituency, MPs can meet with local businesses and community groups, attend local events and visit schools, hospitals or job centres to see for themselves how services are being delivered. Conversations in their constituency can help to inform an MPs’ priorities when they are in Parliament.
An MP will often hold advice surgeries, either in person or online, in their constituency. Surgeries are an opportunity for local people to ask if their situation is one that the MP can help them with.
Dealing with cases that are raised by constituents in this way, or via emails and calls to their office, can take up much of an MP’s time when they are not busy with parliamentary work. Constituency office staff can assist with this caseload.”
HERE IS THE ORIGINAL VERSION:
“What do MPs do?
The UK public elects Members of Parliament (MPs) to represent their interests and concerns in the House of Commons. MPs consider and can propose new laws as well as raising issues that matter to you in the House. This includes asking government ministers questions about current issues including those which affect local constituents.
MPs split their time between working in Parliament itself, working in the constituency that elected them and working for their political party.
Some MPs from the governing party (or parties) become government ministers with specific responsibilities in certain areas, such as Health or Defence. These MPs do not stop working for their constituency and, whatever their role in Government or Parliament, will still hold regular surgeries to help their constituents.
What do MPs do in Parliament?
When Parliament is sitting (meeting), MPs generally spend their time working in the House of Commons. This can include raising issues affecting their constituents, attending debates and voting on new laws. This can either be by asking a question of a government minister on your behalf or supporting and highlighting particular campaigns which local people feel strongly about.
Most MPs are also members of committees, which look at issues in detail, from government policy and new laws, to wider topics like human rights.
What do MPs do in their constituency?
In their constituency, MPs often hold a ‘surgery’ in their office, where local people can come along to discuss any matters that concern them.
MPs also attend functions, visit schools and businesses and generally try to meet as many people as possible. This gives MPs further insight and context into issues they may discuss when they return to Westminster.
Who is your MP?
To find out who represents you and how to contact them, you can:
- Use the Find Your MP tool on the UK Parliament website
- Ring the House of Commons Enquiry Service on 020 7219 4272”
Perverting the Course of Justice
The offence of perverting the course of justice is committed when an accused:
- does an act or series of acts;
- which has or have a tendency to pervert; and
- which is or are intended to pervert;
- the course of public justice.
The course of justice must be in existence at the time of the act(s). The course of justice starts when:
- an event has occurred, from which it can reasonably be expected that an investigation will follow; or
- investigations which could/might bring proceedings have actually started; or
- proceedings have started or are about to start.
The course of justice refers to civil justice as well criminal justice.
I surmise they do not like my website very much!
Can You Sue for Narcissistic Abuse? Legal Grounds, Precedents & Case Studies by By Jack Hansen
“It’s crucial to remember that pursuing legal action against narcissistic abusers is not only about seeking compensation but also about holding them accountable for their harmful actions. With the right legal guidance and a strong case, justice can be served for those impacted by narcissistic abuse.“
Most of the public are victims of narcissistic/psychopathic abuse by those running (ruining) the UK: CORRUPTION/ NEGLECT/ SOCIAL MURDER/ SEXUAL/ PSYCHOLOGICAL/ PHYSICAL / FINANCIAL/ DATA/ SOCIAL ABUSE. With the sheer volume of evidence/knowledge to support a case, [readily available], I am highly surprised that the public en masse, have not sought to seek redress and justice. I can only assume that there are no ethical lawyers available any more, and, or that they have no experts in this field. It could be the answer to our problems, & around the world – by declaring the traitors, mentally unfit for public office – because they are demonstrating they have serious personality disorders.
The Danger of Dark Triad Leaders by Steve Taylor Ph.D. Psychology Today.
“There is a terrible destructiveness at the heart of dark triad leaders. Perhaps because they live in a state of complete disconnection, and feel a deep sense of lack, they feel a deep malevolence towards the world, and other human beings. It’s almost as if they are on a mission to cause as much as chaos and devastation as possible while in power — to kill people, to bomb countries, to destroy institutions, to damage the environment, or to roll back rights and regulations.” Sounds familiar doesn’t it?
10/06/2025 – URGENT❗ STOP THEM BEFORE THEY STOP US❗
Government wants to spy on your bank account – we must stop them video by Big Brother Watch
08/06/25Perhaps all the decision makers should regularly be reminded; that under Articles 7 of THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (UDOHR) ” All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.” but this declaration, like many of the laws, are only being used against the public.
See also UNVEILING THE SCANDAL BEHIND THE SCENES IN THE NHS All is not what it seems and certainly not how it should be. This is despite £multibillions allocated, it does not appear to be proportionally spent on patient care and high calibre staff. Otherwise, standards of health & social care would not have deteriorated so much. How much money from the budget is allocated to health ministers/ chiefs/directors/regulators/admin etc – compared with the amount provided for actual medical staff and equipment? It is time to stop running it as a business and prioritise affordable and professional healthcare as an essential service to the public – who have paid for it.
In recent years, identity politics – advocacy or political stances based on characteristics like gender, race, sexuality, etc. – has become a dominant force in public discourse. At its best, it can amplify marginalised voices and address historical injustices. But when weaponised, identity politics can be used to silence debate, discredit individuals unfairly, or distract from substantive issues. This weaponisation often involves accusing critics or whistleblowers of bigotry (racism, transphobia, etc.) not because they are actually motivated by hate, but to put them on the defensive and deter others from listening to their message. In the UK, this dynamic has played out in multiple contexts – for example, a woman raising concerns about a policy that she feels endangers female service users might be branded a transphobe if that policy relates to gender identity, thereby shifting focus from her actual argument to an attack on her character…”
Updated 13/06/25 Global psychopathic manipulation by Dr John Campbell and his guest “doctor, endocrinologist, author, medical researcher and teacher, professor David Anderson” – discussing how our very existence is under threat.
Coordinated actions by our dysfunctional, controlling leaders & their enablers around the world; have resulted in many of the worst personality types acquiring positions of trust, [they pass the jobs around amongst themselves]. They are happy to destroy whoever and whatever it takes – to satisfy their own goals. The warning signs were missed and now we have to quickly take action to deal with the aftermath. It should now be abundantly clear to everyone, there is no-one in any authority position; going to help the public.
“Some people try to be tall by cutting off the heads of others!” ― Paramahansa Yogananda
8 Ways Gaslighters Manipulate and Control Relationships How gaslighters traumatize and exploit victims to achieve their goals. by Preston Ni M.S.B.A.
Those who have been running (ruining) the UK for decades have proven, ‘beyond a shadow of doubt’; that they were/are only interested in the exploitation of the masses (& throughout the world). Societal issues do not resolve themselves, it takes ethical, competent, and dedicated individuals working together as part of a team – to benefit the whole population.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
https://unfoundation.org/blog/post/9-inspiring-malala-quotes
Quotes below are by Malala Yousafzai
“One child, one teacher, one pen, and one book can change the world.” (Tweet this)
“Some people only ask others to do something. I believe that, why should I wait for someone else? Why don’t I take a step and move forward?” (Tweet this)
“I truly believe the only way we can create global peace is through not only educating our minds, but our hearts and our souls.” (Tweet this)
“Let us make our future now, and let us make our dreams tomorrow’s reality.” (Tweet this)
“So let us wage a global struggle against illiteracy, poverty, and terrorism, and let us pick up our books and pens. They are our most powerful weapons.” (Tweet this)
“If we want to achieve our goal, then let us empower ourselves with the weapon of knowledge and let us shield ourselves with unity and togetherness.” (Tweet this)
“If people were silent, nothing would change.” (Tweet this)
“When the whole world is silent, even one voice becomes powerful.” (Tweet this)
“We want schools and education for every child’s bright future. We will continue our journey to our destination of peace and education for everyone.” (Tweet this)
