BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS WHO COME TO YOU IN SHEEPS CLOTHING

“ Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch…Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. ” – attributed to Benjamin Franklin

16/09/26 THOSE WHO CANNOT BE TRUSTED; HAVE NO CREDIBILITY OR AUTHORITY OVER US – NO MATTER WHAT THEY MAY CLAIM. IT IS IRRATIONAL TO BELIEVE THAT DYSFUNCTIONAL, CRIMINAL TYPES SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MAKE DECISIONS ON OUR BEHALF.

Q. WHEN IS THE LAW NOT THE LAW? In no particular order:

A. WHEN IT IS USED AS A WEAPON AGAINST THE PUBLIC.

A. WHEN THOSE WHOSE JOB IT IS TO UPHOLD THE LAW, ARE TOO BUSY BREAKING IT THEMSELVES.

A. WHEN THE AUTHORITIES ENGAGE IN CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

A.WHEN THE LAWS ARE MADE BY TRAITORS.

A. WHEN THOSE IN POSITIONS OF POWER – ABUSE THEIR POSITIONS FOR SELF GAIN AND USE INFLUENCE TO AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY.

A. WHEN CORRUPTION IS PROTECTING CORRUPTION.

Power grabs: They are systematically engaging in actions to enslave us by micromanaging every aspect of our lives, to make us completely dependent on them: They are removing our income & possessions, destroying employment opportunities, racketeering: (extortion) by artificially raising the cost of living & via unethical taxes, fines and penalties, causing divisions in society, removing all our human rights, stealing our kids & more – whilst they do whatever they like, to whoever they like, whenever they like – and generate great wealth for themselves at the expense and to the detriment of everyone else.

Judge them by their actions, & the people they surround themselves with, but never by what they claim. They speak with forked tongues. They are the epitome of Serious Organised Crime.

They believe they are untouchable because they are all corrupt, but all they have done is prove how unfit for positions of trust they are. We have more legal right to remove them, than they have to go unpunished and we must remove all their ill-gotten gains (assets); to rebuild the UK and our lives. We can make all the important decisions amongst ourselves – with input from every ethical citizen. We do not need the abusive predators.

In these days of worldwide confusion, there is a dire need for men and women who will courageously do battle for truth – Martin Luther King

https://donottrustthem.com/wp/categories-and-definitions-of-serious-organised-crime/

Ch.5 THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES.

23/09/26 ‘…anger is RISING!’ Neil Oliver video: ‘…they’re stepping things up a gear!’ The premeditated acts against the citizens in the UK & globally – is unmistakeable now!

19/09/26 The Law by Frédéric Bastiat. Video from freedomuniversity

“ Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) was a French economist, statesman, and author. He did most of his writing during the years just before— and immediately following — the Revolution of February 1848. This was the period when France was rapidly turning to complete socialism. As a Deputy to the Legislative Assembly, Mr. Bastiat was studying and explaining each socialist fallacy as it appeared. And he explained how socialism must inevitably degenerate into communism. But most of his countrymen chose to ignore his logic.

The Law is here presented again because the same situation exists in America today as in the France of 1848. The same socialist-communist ideas and plans that were then adopted in France are now sweeping America. The explanations and arguments then advanced against socialism by Mr. Bastiat are — word for word — equally valid today. His ideas deserve a serious hearing.

Walter Williams, an economics professor at George Mason University, states:
Many philosophers have made important contributions to the discourse on liberty, Bastiat among them. But Bastiat’s greatest contribution is that he took the discourse out of the ivory tower and made ideas on liberty so clear that even the unlettered can understand them and statists cannot obfuscate them. Clarity is crucial to persuading our fellowman of the moral superiority of personal liberty.” 👈👏

“The delusion of the day is to enrich all the classes at the expense of each other, it is to generate plunder under the pretence of organising it.”

“When a portion of wealth passes out of the hands of him who acquired it without his consent, and without compensation, to him who has not created it, whether by force or by artifice, I say that property is violated, that plunder is perpetrated.”

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it.”

“Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim – when he defends himself – as a criminal.”

All the above quotations are from the Book: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat. [Originally published in French in 1850 later published in English as part of Essays in Political Economy from the translation by Patrick James Sterling.] This was a man worth listening to.

PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOUR TO WATCH OUT FOR – WITHIN THE GOVT; WHICH MIRRORS – SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME. e.g.The main categories of serious offences covered are:

cyber crime

child sexual exploitation and abuse

illegal drugs

illegal firearms

fraud

money laundering and other economic crime

bribery and corruption

organised immigration crime

modern slavery and human trafficking

SOCIAL MURDER.

PROFITS BEFORE CARE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_murder

“ Friedrich Engels: “When one individual inflicts bodily injury upon another such that death results, we call the deed manslaughter; when the assailant knew in advance that the injury would be fatal, we call his deed murder. But when society places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death, … knows that these thousands of victims must perish, and yet permits these conditions to remain, its deed is murder just as surely as the deed of the single individual; disguised, malicious murder, murder against which none can defend himself, which does not seem what it is, because no man sees the murderer, because the death of the victim seems a natural one, since the offence is more one of omission than of commission. But murder it remains.[2][3] ”

Engels argued these conditions were the results of inherent exploitation and pursuit of profit under the capitalist system. In his opinion, at fault was “the class which at present holds social and political control”, who placed workers in a position where they came to die an early and unnatural death.[4] In a review of academic usage of the phrase “social murder” throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, authors Stella Medvedyuk, Piara Govender, and Dennis Raphael identified four key aspects of social murder as per Engels’ original definition:

  1. It involves premature death due to working conditions.
  2. The working conditions are themselves a consequence of exploitation under capitalism.
  3. There exists a class (e.g. the bourgeoisie) that benefits from this exploitation.
  4. The benefiting class is aware of the exploitation, and thus responsible for it.[4]

In the 21st century, usage of the phrase has expanded such that it doesn’t necessarily include a critique of capitalist exploitation. In the more general sense, social murder has been used to refer to excess death as a result of bad public policy.[4] ”

WHAT IS SOCIAL MURDER? Article by Clifford Thurlow: https://cliffordthurlow.com/2022/11/10/what-is-social-murder/

“Social murder is a phrase applied to changes in government policy that lead to greater poverty and result in anxiety, suicide and early death.

The perfect example of social murder is the stance taken by the Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron and his Chancellor George Osborne with the introduction of ‘austerity’ after the financial crisis in 2008.

The crisis and the recession that followed was caused by international banks providing cheap credit with lax lending standards to new home buyers. When the housing market collapsed, banks were left holding trillions of dollars of worthless investments in subprime mortgages.

British bankers taking home millions in bonuses had in a deluded frenzy made themselves believe that buying debt could be turned to profit and now needed billions from the Treasury to prevent bankruptcy and national disaster. 

Where did the money come from? It came from the pockets and wallets of working people in wage restraints and unprecedented cuts to hospitals, schools, pensions, social welfare, legal aid, mental health provision, probation services and the proliferation of zero hours contracts.

The Normalisation of Hunger

…When Cameron came to power in coalition with the Liberal Democrats in 2010, the Trussell Trust operated 35 food banks.

Now, in 2024, after 14 years of Conservative government under Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak, the Trussell Trust runs 1,400 food banks with at least, according to the government’s own figures, an additional 1,172 independent food banks.

About 30% of NHS workers earn less than £23,000 per year, so little, according to the BBC, the Leicester NHS Trust hasn’t increased staff wages but opened food banks with essential groceries and toiletries. Perhaps they have taken a leaf from the Asda playbook. The supermarket chain has donated £5 million to the Trussell Trust to help their own underpaid employees get free food…

What is Social Murder?

Social murder is the ‘stealthy’ normalisation of social injustice, poverty, deprivation, mums going without to feed their littles ones, local councils too strapped for cash to provide school meals for hungry children, working families who work long hours and are still unable to keep up with the rent, council tax, heating bills.

…The brutal policies of Cameron continued by May, Johnson and Truss, each in turn taking a stride further to the right, lead us to the neoliberal idealogue Rishi Sunak…

Lest we forget: as Chancellor, Sunak wrote off £4 billion in bogus PPE contracts and £37 billion went down the drain in a test and trace project that never worked. According to the Daily Mirror, his wife Akshata Murty in 2021 claimed up to £100,000 in taxpayer’s cash – your money – to pay furloughed staff at her gym business and had a loan of £1.3 million written off by the Treasury. The Sunaks slyly kept their American Green Cards and Akshata Murty kept her non-dom status saving many millions of pounds until caught in the act.

Rishi Sunak’s family has investments in the giant oil company Shell and is ‘directly profiting from continued fossil fuel exploitation,’ according to Byline Times. Sunak’s wife has a £690 million stake in Infosys, her father’s internet company with offices that have remained open in Moscow while most businesses have closed up shop since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 

If you judge a leader by the ministers he chooses, placing disgraced Suella Braverman in his first Cabinet as Home Secretary and Jeremy Hunt after five year ‘stealthily’ undermining the NHS as Chancellor of the Exchequer tells us everything. We do not have a government. We have a rogue’s gallery of greedy criminals killing their own people.  

The Axeman 

Iain Duncan Smith illustrates what is social murder

Iain Duncan Smith

Cuts to public services, benefits and Universal Credit introduced by Iain Duncan Smith have resulted in more than 334,000 excess deaths as a direct result of austerity, according to a study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, reported in the Guardian, 5 October 2022.

The authors of the study suggest additional deaths between 2012 and 2019 – prior to the Covid pandemic – ‘reflect an increase in people dying prematurely after experiencing reduced income, ill-health, poor nutrition and housing, and social isolation.’

Liz Truss came to power pledging tax cuts for the rich. Rishi Sunak is more canny. He won’t say as much. He’ll just get on and do it. It is a fool who believes politicians will end the problems and poverty they have created in the first place. Levelling up is, of course, just a phrase, a joke.

A spokesman for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation said: ‘Never once have I heard a Conservative leader, or politician for that matter, face the fact and offer a solution to the fact that more than one in five people in the UK (22%) live in poverty – that’s 14.5 million people. Of these, 8.1 million are working-age adults, 4.3 million are children and 2.1 million are pensioners.’

The phrase social murder was coined by Friedrich Engels in The Condition of the Working-Class in England, a book published in his 1845. 

What is social murder? Conservative policy is social murder.

Read Margaret Thatcher Ruined Britain – when the race to poverty got started. ”

Covid-19: Social murder, they wrote—elected, unaccountable, and unrepentant – British Medical Journal

BMJ 2021; 372 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n314 (Published 04 February 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n314 Kamran Abbasi, executive editor kabbasi@bmj.com

“After two million deaths, we must have redress for mishandling the pandemic

Murder is an emotive word. In law, it requires premeditation. Death must be deemed to be unlawful. How could “murder” apply to failures of a pandemic response? Perhaps it can’t, and never will, but it is worth considering. When politicians and experts say that they are willing to allow tens of thousands of premature deaths for the sake of population immunity or in the hope of propping up the economy, is that not premeditated and reckless indifference to human life? If policy failures lead to recurrent and mistimed lockdowns, who is responsible for the resulting non-covid excess deaths? When politicians wilfully neglect scientific advice, international and historical experience, and their own alarming statistics and modelling because to act goes against their political strategy or ideology, is that lawful? Is inaction, action?1 How big an omission is not acting immediately after the World Health Organization declared a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020?

At the very least, covid-19 might be classified as “social murder,” as recently explained by two professors of criminology.2 The philosopher Friedrich Engels coined the phrase when describing the political and social power held by the ruling elite over the working classes in 19th century England. His argument was that the conditions created by privileged classes inevitably led to premature and “unnatural” death among the poorest classes.3 In The Road to Wigan Pier, George Orwell echoed these themes in describing the life and living conditions of working class people in England’s industrial north.4 Today, “social murder” may describe the lack of political attention to social determinants and inequities that exacerbate the pandemic. Michael Marmot argues that as we emerge from covid-19 we must build back fairer.5

International accountability

A pandemic has implications both for the residents of a country and for the international community, so sovereign governments should arguably be held accountable to the international community for their actions and omissions on covid-19.

What is the prison sentence for racketeering in the UK?

“ Racketeering, involving criminal activities to extort money or advantage, is a serious offence with stringent penalties under UK law. The severity of the punishment reflects the impact on society, financial systems, and public trust.

…This term covers a range of illegal activities performed as part of an organised crime group. Common forms include bribery, extortion, money laundering and fraud. The Proceeds of Crime Act 2022 and the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 are key legislative frameworks targeting these activities.” Quotes from https://prisonguide.co.uk/whats-the-prison-sentence-for-racketeering/

“ 1. Whats the prison sentence for racketeering in the UK? The sentence can range from several years to life imprisonment, depending on the severity of the crimes and other factors.

2. What laws are used to prosecute racketeering in the UK? Racketeering is prosecuted under laws like the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.

3. Can racketeering charges be defended in court? Yes, common defenses include lack of intent, coercion, and entrapment. Legal representation is crucial for these cases.

4. Whats the prison sentence for racketeering in organized crime? Sentences for organized crime racketeering can be particularly severe, often involving long prison terms and significant fines.

5. How do authorities investigate racketeering cases? Investigations often involve undercover operations, surveillance, and financial analysis to uncover the extent of the criminal activities.

6. Whats the prison sentence for racketeering involving fraud? Fraud-related racketeering can result in lengthy prison sentences, especially if large sums of money are involved.

7. What impact does racketeering have on communities? Racketeering can cause significant harm to communities, including economic damage and increased fear of crime.

8. How have UK racketeering laws evolved? Laws have evolved to address new forms of organized crime, with harsher penalties and more sophisticated investigative techniques.

9. Whats the prison sentence for racketeering with no prior criminal record? First-time offenders may receive more lenient sentences, but the severity of the crime will still influence the outcome.

10. What role do international collaborations play in combating racketeering? International cooperation is crucial in addressing cross-border racketeering activities, allowing for more effective law enforcement efforts. ”

ABUSE OF TRUST: Whats the Prison Sentence for Abuse of Trust Updated 20/09/26

  • Financial Fraud: Offenders can face up to 10 years in prison for severe cases of financial fraud involving abuse of trust.
  • Sexual Offences: Sentences for sexual offences involving abuse of trust, such as those committed by teachers or caregivers, can range from several years to life imprisonment.
  • Misconduct in Public Office: This offence can result in a sentence of up to life imprisonment, particularly in cases involving significant harm to public trust.

Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 Acts of the Scottish Parliament2008 asp 6Part 1Section 1

Changes to legislation: Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008

[The deeply corrupted authorities; are inclined to alter & or introduce newer legislation & create loopholes after the fact, in an attempt to pervert the course of justice in their favour! I recommend the public keep an eye on them]

1Guarantee of continued judicial independence

(1)The following persons must uphold the continued independence of the judiciary—

(a)the First Minister,

(b)the Lord Advocate,

(c)the Scottish Ministers,

(d)members of the Scottish Parliament, and

(e)all other persons with responsibility for matters relating to—

(i)the judiciary, or

(ii)the administration of justice,

where that responsibility is to be discharged only in or as regards Scotland.

(2)In particular, the First Minister, the Lord Advocate and the Scottish Ministers—

(a)must not seek to influence particular judicial decisions through any special access to the judiciary, and

(b)must have regard to the need for the judiciary to have the support necessary to enable them to carry out their functions.

(3)In this section “the judiciary” means the judiciary of—

(a)the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom,

(b)any other court established under the law of Scotland, and

(c)any international court.

(4)In subsection (3)(c) “international court” means the International Court of Justice or any other court or tribunal which exercises jurisdiction, or performs functions of a judicial nature, in pursuance of—

(a)an agreement to which the United Kingdom or Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom is a party, or

(b)a resolution of the Security Council or General Assembly of the United Nations.

19/09/26 Article from the Journal; *Law Society Scotland – ‘friends of govt😉’ – because they are all in it together! https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal-hub/articles/meet-the-five-new-senators-appointed-to-the-college-of-justice-by-his-majesty-the-king-including-former-lord-advocate/

The Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain had two lucrative, powerful positions for years; as head of the Crown Office & was also chief legal adviser to the Scottish Government, therefore enabling corruption – to protect corruption; which is the ‘[nasty] sticky stuff’ which holds them all together. She has since been promoted to a higher position (of course she has!), for her ‘talents;’ in perverting the course of justice and more…

“ His Majesty the King, on the recommendation of First Minister John Swinney, has appointed five new Senators to the College of Justice, including a former Lord Advocate.

Senators hear a wide variety of important civil and criminal business in the Supreme Courts of Scotland.

They preside over the most complex and high-profile cases where decisions have a significant impact.

In the Court of Session, Senators hear an extensive range of civil business including commercial, family, immigration and international child abduction cases. Judicial review cases often involve important and novel points of public law. In the High Court of Justiciary, Senators preside over the most serious criminal cases. ”

Dorothy Bain, amongst many others in positions of trust, is a keen advocate of supporting rapists, and of juryless trials and the consequences of her incompatibility for positions of trust – has resulted in; SEXUAL ABUSE – increasing in Scotland

A Betrayal Of Victims! video by Silver Fox Hot Takes

https://petercherbi.blogspot.com/2021/03/first-interests-judge-recommended-for_8.html

“Judge recommended for judicial role by Nicola Sturgeon – found First Minister committed three counts of professional misconduct – in Law Society probe of Ms Sturgeon’s failure to provide legal service protections for domestic violence victim” “..who then ‘stood down’ from the legal profession – to contest a seat for the Scottish National Party;”  enabling Sturgeon to avoid accountability – starting how she meant to go on; using her position/influence to promote the *case worker lawyer, to the position of sheriff, after her case was dropped by the Law Society of Scotland. * “Olga Pasportnikov said: “The complaint…identified three counts ‘of professional misconduct by breach of code of conduct and conduct unbecoming a solicitor.” But, Sturgeon was promoted to the role of First Minister!! 26/09/26 Forgot to mention🙄 the other most obvious sign of corruption, was when case worker lawyer *Olga Pasportnikov was recommended to be a sheriff by Nicola Sturgeon, (of course she was), because ‘you scratch my back and I will scratch yours’…rewarded for being a good little sycophant. There are so many of them.

🤔It Stinks doesn’t it? And of course the UK protect it all; by not criminally investigating the law-breaking Scottish govt or the company they keep/promote.

‘When dishonesty begets dishonesty: ‘Unethical behaviour is rewarded/promoted, but decency is treated with contempt, leading to the wider public being put at great risk of harm’.

THE SNP PRIORITISE/PROMOTE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES AND ARE KNOWINGLY PLACING THE PUBLIC IN HARMS WAY.

15/09/2026 Please share to warn people. After adding to the article; Britain’s Dystopian Plan to Seize the Web (EVERYONE Should Know) | UK Politics video by Cheshire Cat Musings; on my editing page – it became under attack. I was blocked from opening a link to legislation from Prison Sentencing Guides on Abuse Of Trust and I copied over some of the article; then banners started to block my editing page and it would not allow me to publish. This is direct interference on my website …it is illegal as demonstrated on my page: Computer Misuse Act 1990 This has happened many times.

I originally posted this on Ch.3. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. – Edmund Burke

https://prisonguide.co.uk/whats-the-prison-sentence-for-abuse-of-trust/

“Abuse of trust occurs when an individual in a position of authority or responsibility uses their position to exploit or harm others. This can happen in various settings, including educational institutions, healthcare, financial sectors, and workplaces. Common examples include financial fraud by a trustee, misconduct by a teacher, or exploitation by a caregiver.” […and it happens routinely on a daily basis by many individuals working in positions of authority].

Legal Framework and Sentencing Guidelines

The prison sentence for abuse of trust in the UK is determined by several factors, including the severity of the offence, the harm caused, and the offender’s intent. Under UK law, abuse of trust can fall under various offences, such as fraud, sexual offences, or misconduct in public office, each carrying different sentencing guidelines.

Typical Prison Sentences

The prison sentence for abuse of trust can range from a few months to several years, depending on the specific circumstances. For instance:

  • Financial Fraud: Offenders can face up to 10 years in prison for severe cases of financial fraud involving abuse of trust.
  • Sexual Offences: Sentences for sexual offences involving abuse of trust, such as those committed by teachers or caregivers, can range from several years to life imprisonment.
  • Misconduct in Public Office: This offence can result in a sentence of up to life imprisonment, particularly in cases involving significant harm to public trust.”

Prison Guide/Prison Sentence for Perverting the Course of Justice UK

“ Perverting the course of justice encompasses various actions aimed at misleading or obstructing the judicial process. This can include:

  • Providing false information to the police
  • Concealing or destroying evidence
  • Intimidating witnesses
  • Falsely reporting a crime

Sentencing Guidelines for Perverting the Course of Justice

The sentencing guidelines for perverting the course of justice vary depending on the severity of the offence and the circumstances involved. As per the Sentencing Council, the maximum sentence for this offence is life imprisonment and/or a fine. However, typical sentences range between four and 36 months of imprisonment​​​​. ”

CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY – NULL & VOID

Q. When are governments null & void? A. When too many individuals working in high office – are clearly, not operating independently of each other:

All part of the Divide & Conquer Strategy, giving themselves more wealth & power, whilst you are being distracted by greedy, politicians seemingly, attacking each other. As each week goes by our ability to respond and defend ourselves becomes weaker. DOING NOTHING IS NOT AN OPTION. We must take action NOW! Marches, [alone], are futile. How weak are we, when we allow the frauds in power to destroy us using the resources they dishonestly acquired; but are meant to protect us; and they use violence against us – but we do not defend ourselves properly to remove their control? What are you waiting for? There are no heroes coming; we need to look out for ourselves and each other. Decency and humanity must win this battle or all will be lost forever. If you do not care about yourselves enough, then at least do it for the kids who will suffer the most…again. We owe it to them.
Britain’s Dystopian Plan to Seize the Web (EVERYONE Should Know) | UK Politics – video by Cheshire Cat Musings. It’s another power grab by the control freaks, because THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES and monitoring/silencing us for personal gain. There are many more EXAMPLES OF HOW THE CORRUPT AUTHORITIES & the company they keep – AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY –

“ The British Parliament is bringing in legislation to give Ofcom the state broadcaster regulator sweeping powers; to go after social media platforms like YouTube, X (Twitter), Instagram and Facebook and be treated like legacy broadcasters. It will work in lockstep with Nadine Dorries’ (Reform UK) Online Safety Bill and legacy legislation like the Communications act 2003 and the equalities act 2010. Essentially you will be in danger of being de-platformed if you speak outside what the state deems “acceptable” realms of debate and discourse. This is completely unacceptable to a free society and open debate.”

https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4285

https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/67647/documents/8737

KNOW THY ENEMY

They are not interested in a free society, they are only interested in Totalitarianism – “Traditional social institutions and organizations are discouraged and suppressed, making people more willing to be merged into a single unified movement. Totalitarian states typically pursue a special goal to the exclusion of all others, with all resources directed toward its attainment, regardless of the cost.

“Totalitarianism, form of government that theoretically permits no individual freedom and that seeks to subordinate all aspects of individual life to the authority of the state.“ by Britannica.

Also, please look at this equally valid information; “ Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet journalist and a former KGB agent who outlined a comprehensive perspective on ideological subversion. Shedding light on the subtle and pervasive methods used to destabilise a society from within.“ You should be able to recognise the patterns of behaviour which are being forced upon us – it was planned decades ago.

Please read: the informative 4 Stages of Ideological Subversion psychological warfare; by Yuri Bezmenov – Nitigya Raj Pant Medium website“

The 4 Stages of Subversion by Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet journalist and a former KGB agent. video by GBPPR2

“Stage 1: Demoralization

Demoralization is the first stage of ideological subversion, and it involves the systematic undermining of a society’s moral and ethical foundations. Bezmenov explained that this process typically takes 15–20 years, roughly the time needed to educate one generation. During this stage, foreign agents seek to infiltrate educational institutions, media, and cultural platforms to influence the minds of young people. The goal is to instill a sense of disillusionment, moral relativism, and a rejection of traditional values.

In the demoralization phase, individuals are conditioned to question their own cultural identity, history, and societal norms. The emphasis is on creating a sense of instability and disorientation within the target population. This sets the stage for the subsequent phases of ideological subversion.

Stage 2: Destabilization

Once demoralization has taken root, the next stage is destabilization. This phase is characterized by the weakening of essential institutions and structures within the society. Bezmenov pointed out that this process can be expedited if foreign influence successfully manipulates the political, economic, and defense systems. Key sectors such as law enforcement, military, and intelligence are targeted to compromise the nation’s ability to respond to external and internal threats.

Destabilization aims to create a state of crisis, fostering a sense of insecurity and anxiety among the population. Economic instability, social unrest, and political polarization become prominent features of this stage, laying the groundwork for further manipulation.

Stage 3: Crisis

The third stage of ideological subversion is the crisis phase. By this point, the society is in a state of chaos, with heightened tension and a breakdown of trust in institutions. Bezmenov highlighted that this crisis could manifest in various forms, including political upheaval, economic collapse, or social unrest. The goal is to push the society to a breaking point where people are desperate for solutions, paving the way for radical change.

During the crisis phase, external forces may exploit the vulnerabilities within the society, offering alternative ideologies or solutions. This creates an opportunity for a shift in power dynamics and the imposition of foreign ideologies on the now susceptible population.

Stage 4: Normalization

The final stage is normalization, where the previously subverted ideology becomes the new norm. Bezmenov emphasized that this phase is not about a return to stability but rather the establishment of a new societal order based on the foreign ideology. The once-targeted society is now reshaped according to the infiltrating force’s vision, erasing its original cultural identity and values.

Normalization solidifies the control of the foreign ideology, and the population may no longer resist as the altered reality becomes accepted and internalized. The society is transformed, and the process of ideological subversion is complete.

“Yuri Bezmenov’s insights into the stages of ideological subversion remain relevant, serving as a reminder of the importance of preserving the values, institutions, and cultural identity that define a nation. Understanding these stages provides a framework for recognizing and countering potential threats to the integrity of society.”

I have copied the links onto several sections; due to its importance to our current situation.

Yet, they have no legal or moral right to do any of it. WE DO NOT NEED UNSCRUPULOUS, ARROGANT, POLITICIANS RUINING OUR LIVES. who have given themselves the right to attack us and this will not improve – unless we forcibly remove them by MARCHING THEM OUT OF OFFICE. No violence needed – unless necessary in self defence.

THE DIGITAL ID TRAP – Another power grab to abuse & exploit the public.

12/09/26 Today we see more money thrown at Farage from his wealthy connections and shockingly, some people think this is a good thing. Some are also moaning about the loss of billionaires from the UK.

Q. How many politicians have to be exposed and for how many more times; before some actually absorb the fact; they are all made the same way? The rich have never cared about the rest of us. They always align themselves with only those can help them achieve more – for themselves. We are just cash cows to them and now want our kids to be ‘canon fodder’ in the wars they provoked. They are insane as well as being mass murderers.

Q. Ask yourselves, who are the persons destroying the lives of millions of ordinary people and countries around the world?

A. Those who acquired the most wealth from their unethical actions – usually by the exploitation of the masses. AKA The parasitic/Epstein class of predators – who feed off the suffering of others.

The worlds most wealthy individuals; did not earn the bulk of their money from being ethical, talented, hardworking, upstanding citizens who are beyond reproach. No, they manipulated their way into position and there is little evidence of them actually doing any work themselves – but they do take credit & payments for the work of others; whilst they swan around, often blowing their own trumpets. They are often paid many £thousands on various platforms – for their presence. They spend all their time; attention seeking & creating opportunities to acquire more money for themselves.

Q Have any of them greatly contributed to the lives of the ordinary members of the public – to justify the amount of money they have supposedly earned?

A. NO. But millions have been abused in every way it is possible to abuse someone; e.g. by forcing us to lose homes, property, jobs, incomes, families, cars, children, our freedom, and deliberately caused many of us health issues…..etc.

The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse- Edmund Burke

Money passed between the rich folk is usually a bribe to buy power/positions…and yet, every day we see members of the public forgetting how we got into this mess in the first place. I have even seen members of the public; saying they do not care about how they acquired the money. Really!

image by Dunson

Q. What personality types are destroying our lives and the world we live in?

…to include the entourage of sycophants and idiots who support them; financially or by stroking their egos as a result of repeatedly putting their faith in unscrupulous, controlling individuals; by treating them as heroes & whilst ignoring their harm.

Those with behaviour patterns recognised to be either narcissistic, sociopathic, psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, sadistic or some other dysfunctional dangerous personality types.

TRAITORS by Collins dictionary

Page update 17/09/26 THE DANGERS OF BEING LED BY FAKE LEADERS

Ch.2. THE DANGERS OF BEING LED BY FAKE LEADERS

https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/how-narcissistic-leaders-destroy-within

‘True narcissists, O’Reilly says, are self-serving and lack integrity. “They believe they’re superior and thus not subject to the same rules and norms. Studies show they’re more likely to act dishonestly to achieve their ends. They know they’re lying, and it doesn’t bother them. They don’t feel shame.” They are also often reckless in the pursuit of glory — sometimes successfully, but often with dire consequences.’

“ But even worse, narcissists change the companies or countries they lead, much like bad money drives out good, and those changes can outlast their own tenure, O’Reilly says. Divergent voices are silenced, flattery and servility are rewarded, and cynicism and apathy corrode any sense of shared purpose in a culture where everyone’s out for themselves. In the extreme, they can destroy the institution itself.”

NARCISSISTS and other controlling personality types. will always manipulate the masses into ‘following them‘ by latching onto what they know their audience want to hear. Hence the title of this page: BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS WHO COME TO YOU IN SHEEPS CLOTHING!

18/09/26 The elites see themselves as ‘Gods’, but are closer to representing; all things that are evil. and we all know; that money is at the root of all things which are evil.

“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.”

— Henry Kissinger. WEF until he died.

Who CONTROLS Big Pharma, can also make huge profits from experimenting on the public, and let us not forget the labs who produce a plethora of poisons and place in our foods & elsewhere, or those who are willing to pollute the earth – often bribed with taxpayer money and then awarded bonuses! Our corrupt, parasitic class, only appear to surround themselves with equally, weak, corrupt organisations and individuals; for their mutual benefit, with a reckless disregard to the consequences of their decisions on the rest of us.

And those who possess the Epstein Files, can CONTROL all those so-called elites whose names lie within.

[18/09/26 Our traitorous govt do not want to spend serious money on the defence & security of the good citizens in the UK, even after pushing us into another war scenario. However, when it came to security for the 2012 Olympics, the sky was the limit; protecting/funding a sporting event on the world stage.]

G4S broke their contract with the govt – by failing to deliver, and no refund of taxpayers money was given. Where were the checks and balances; banks/HMRC/regulators/auditors etc who are supposed to keep an [independent], honest eye on govt spending of public money? Doing what they always do – look the other way! As they too; are operating under false pretences & are paid to do so = complicit with misappropriation of public funds and contracts for those carefully selected by the authorities.

Q. Why is it they never have a problem funding social events/ incompetent and corrupt organisations and companies for profit – but claim thy cannot afford to protect US in crisis situations?

A. They are the cause & effect of ALL the crises, so they have no qualms about destroying us and specific areas of the planet for the sole purpose of stealing the wealth and power which comes with it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_for_the_2012_Summer_Olympics

“The security preparations for the 2012 Summer Olympics—with the exception of the air counter-terrorist plan, which was an RAF responsibility—was led by the police, with 13,000 officers available, supported by 17,000 members of the armed forces. Royal Navy, Army and RAF assets, including ships situated in the Thames, Typhoon jets, radar, helicopter-borne snipers, and surface-to-air missiles, were deployed as part of the security operation which was named Operation Olympics by the Ministry of Defence.[1] The final cost of the security operation was estimated £553m (pounds sterling).

The budget for venue security was being partly funded by the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) as well as using the contingency from the £9.3 billion infrastructure budget. Private security firm G4S, enduring scandals regarding training and manpower that emerged mere weeks before the games, provided only about 10,000 staff, instead of their intended 13,700.

This was the biggest security operation Britain had faced for decades, with 40,000 security personnel. On 7 July 2005, the day after the city was selected to host the Olympics, the London Underground and a London bus had been attacked by terrorist group Al-Qaeda. ”

Our own governments are the most obvious terrorists -the biggest threat to the National Security and our safety – in the UK – and in the global countries where they have financially supported wars and who are forcing their citizens to fight on their behalf. Remember, they also use legislation as weapons against us and alter, and make up new laws/& create loopholes to enable themselves to avoid accountability. They have already introduced corrupt sheriffs to represent the courts, making sure they only serve the authorities agendas.
Terrorism: interpretation.

(1)In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where—

(a)the action falls within subsection (2),

(b)the use or threat is designed to influence the government [F1or an international governmental organisation] or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and

(c)the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious [F2, racial] or ideological cause.

(2)Action falls within this subsection if it—

(a)involves serious violence against a person,

(b)involves serious damage to property,

(c)endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action,

(d)creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or

(e)is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.

(3)The use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1)(b) is satisfied.

(4)In this section—

(a)“action” includes action outside the United Kingdom,

(b)a reference to any person or to property is a reference to any person, or to property, wherever situated,

(c)a reference to the public includes a reference to the public of a country other than the United Kingdom, and

(d)“the government” means the government of the United Kingdom, of a Part of the United Kingdom or of a country other than the United Kingdom.

(5)In this Act a reference to action taken for the purposes of terrorism includes a reference to action taken for the benefit of a proscribed organisation.


They also regularly break laws and encourage others to commit illegal actions on their behalf. Example: the narcissists in Govt legalised the most heinous of crimes:

If the lawmakers/ministers were doing nothing wrong, why do they try to block the link to the article below every time I try to put it on this website?

17/09/26 Update: Let us see how long the link lasts this time! I suggest you keep a copy; for future reference. Especially, as no-one seems to know about or discusses this law; made by the dysfunctional, state organised criminals – for another power grab; to exploit and abuse the public.

A full list of MPs who voted to allow spies and secret agents to commit murder, torture and rape without prosecution. 2020

‘Matter of conscience’

Such crimes could be allowed not only on national security grounds, but also for preventing “disorder” and the “economic well-being of the United Kingdom”.

Labour was whipped to abstain on the bill – causing frontbencher Dan Carden MP to tender his resignation to Sir Keir Starmer, who had an amendment to limit the bill’s scope earlier this week.

Carden said that, as a “matter of conscience”, he would vote against the bill, saying the legislation sets “dangerous new precedents” on the rule of law and civil liberties.

But the bill was resoundingly passed by Conservative MPs regardless – and will now pass to the House of Lord’s.

[We have psychopaths and many narcissists in authority positions who are operating without a conscience.]

“ In a statement, Amnesty International said:[10]MPs are signing off on a licence for government agencies to authorise torture and murder. ”

Then passed into law 202; sanctioned by Royal Assent – whilst you were being distracted by the covid power grab.

Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021 by Wikipedia.

“ Upon the return of the bill to the Commons, the amendments preventing the use of minors and vulnerable people and the participation in serious crimes were defeated in a 363 to 267 vote.[33] An amendment tabled by the Labour frontbench was not put to a vote.[34]” they want to use your kids and other vulnerable people to place them in harms way to serve their agendas.

See more in the link: NEW LEGISLATION INTRODUCED UNDER THE GUISE OF THE PANDEMIC 

Please remember Community Spirit is the enemy of tyrants. That is why they have worked really hard for all your lives, creating divisions in society to divide & conquer. Now Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland leaders want to break up the UK, so they can be wannabe tyrants on their own ( or sell us out to the the EU ), and not ruled by England! There is safety in numbers and therefore the citizens across the board – should stay united. UNITED WE STAND – DIVIDED WE FALL.

The public need to realise WE DO NOT NEED UNSCRUPULOUS, ARROGANT, POLITICIANS RUINING OUR LIVES. We could manage much better without them – by making all the decisions ourselves; from working together in the community, throughout the UK, employing authentic people who are vetted & matched to the jobs they are given and say goodbye to all those who have weaseled their way into positions. As only corruption is holding the traitors together, we must hold them to account ourselves and lock them up in the public interest; and take away their rights and assets to rebuild the UK. The countries could be much safer, more secure, run by genuine, law abiding citizens, accountable to each other, and we can divide all the wealth with those decent folk who deserve it. It is a golden opportunity for us to remove our greedy, controlling, authority criminals [& the company they keep/promote] – once and for all.

We must learn from past mistakes and NEVER GIVE ANYONE TOO MUCH POWER OR MONEY EVER AGAIN.

How many of the 7 deadly sins are practised by our fake leaders?

What are the 7 Deadly Sins? (Explained in Detail)

  1. Pride,
  2. Greed,
  3. Wrath,
  4. Lust,
  5. Envy,
  6. Gluttony, and
  7. Sloth

The seven heavenly virtues;

  1. Prudence,
  2. Justice,
  3. Temperance,
  4. Courage,
  5. Faith,
  6. Hope, and
  7. Charity.

One thought on “BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS WHO COME TO YOU IN SHEEPS CLOTHING”

  1. PROFITS BEFORE CARE – DO NOT TRUST THEM September 18, 2026 at 10:08 am

    […] BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS WHO COME TO YOU IN SHEEPS CLOTHING […]

Comments are closed.