“The Increasing dependence on the state is anything but a healthy symptom, it means the whole nation is in a fair way to becoming a herd of sheep, constantly relying on a shepherd to drive them into good pastures. The Shepherds staff soon becomes a rod of iron, and the shepherds into wolves…
Anyone who still possesses the instinct of self-preservation knows perfectly well that only a swindler would try to relieve him of responsibility…those who promise everything are sure to fulfil nothing, and everyone who promises too much is in danger of using evil means to carry out his promises…”
Carl Jung; Civilization in Transition
19/03/25 It gives me great pleasure to announce that I have discovered another trustworthy ally of the public : John Barwell, the founder of Legal Lens website:
“At Legal Lens, we are committed to empowering Litigants in Person (LiPs) by providing transparent and insightful analysis on law and ethics. Founded by John Barwell, Legal Lens was born out of a passion to expose the failures of the legal system and support those often left to face these challenges alone.
Mission Statement
Our mission is to hold power accountable, inspire legal reform, and enhance public understanding of the law. John Barwell’s personal journey and extensive experience in IT, law, and ethics drive our commitment to delivering valuable content that supports individuals, particularly LiPs, in making informed decisions.
Contact Legal Lens – Law and Ethics
Have questions or need more insights? Reach out to us at hello@legallens.co.uk . We’re here to engage with you and provide the guidance you need.” Please take a look and bookmark the site for quick access to informed support and advice. You will not regret it.
John has very graciously written an article about my website with a direct link to mine. I cannot express in words how grateful I am for his support. 🔽 Below is the article which can be found on the Legal Lens website which John wrote to summarise what I have been hoping to achieve. We share the view that the key to be successful in defending ourselves, is to stand firm; armed with conclusive evidence, additional knowledge from reliable sources and a relentless commitment to bring about positive change. Those who can demonstrate integrity will win against the charlatans, who can only engage in more duplicitous actions to avoid accountability.
The Whistleblower’s Gambit: One Woman’s Crusade Against Institutional Rot
Written by John Barwell 18 March 2025
In the labyrinthine world of British bureaucracy, where power often whispers more loudly than justice speaks, Pamela stands as a rather unexpected David to an array of institutional Goliaths. Her weapon? A meticulously crafted website that pulls back the curtain on systemic misconduct with the precision of a surgeon’s scalpel.
The Unlikely Catalyst
Picture, if you will, a quiet residential street where a neighbourly dispute would typically simmer down over a cup of tea. Not so for Pamela. Her intervention on behalf of a neighbour against Caledonia Housing Association became a Kafkaesque journey that would make even the most hardened civil servant wince.
The result? A personal exodus that would make most retreat. Instead, Pamela did something rather remarkable: she began to document.
A History of Institutional Sleight of Hand
Her battle wasn’t newfound. Years earlier, she’d encountered a more personal form of institutional manipulation when her former father-in-law—armed with resources and influence—managed to engineer a council decision that separated her from her infant son. The kind of manoeuvre that would be dismissed as conspiracy theory, were it not so devastatingly documented.
Do Not Trust Them: More Than a Website, A Manifesto
What emerged wasn’t a bitter screed, but a forensically constructed platform. Do Not Trust Them is less a complaint box and more an intricate map of institutional failure. Each page reads like evidence laid bare, each narrative a carefully constructed argument against systemic opacity.
The Resistance
Predictably, the institutions in her crosshairs haven’t taken kindly to such scrutiny. Attempts to silence or discredit have been met with a resolve that can only be described as quintessentially British: polite, unrelenting, and armed with paperwork.
Why It Matters
In an era where institutional trust is as fragile as a politician’s promise, Pamela represents something profound: the individual’s capacity to challenge systemic dysfunction. Her work isn’t just personal—it’s a public service.
“When dishonesty begets dishonesty,” she writes, “unethical behaviour is rewarded, but decency is treated with contempt.”
It’s the kind of line that would make a parliamentary committee squirm.
A Note of Caution
For those tempted to dismiss her as a lone voice, consider this: every significant institutional reform began with someone willing to say, “No, this is not acceptable.”
Curious souls and fellow truth-seekers can delve deeper at Do Not Trust Them
Postscript
“In the grand tradition of British reporting—part expose, part understated outrage—Pamela’s work reminds us that the most powerful weapon against institutional decay is persistent, unflinching transparency. Checkmate, bureaucracy.”
Posted in Regulatory Matters, Whistleblowing and Public Interest Tagged activism, bureaucracy, censorship, government accountability, institutional corruption, justice, Transparency, truth vs power, UK politics, whistleblower
Post navigation
Investigatory Powers Tribunal: Oversight of Surveillance and Secret Powers
Frédéric Bastiat – The Law – Academy of Ideas
23/08/25 As I posted on my page titled EXAMPLES OF HOW THE CORRUPT AUTHORITIES & the company they keep – AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY ABOUT CHILD SEX ABUSE – MY EDITING PAGE CAME UNDER ATTACK. My comments were removed several times. Google was partly responsible as many new tabs rapidly popped up on their own including the google search page, (not my default page) and when I tried to access my editing page it was closed and I was locked out, so had to sign in again. – I cannot explain more at the moment.
18/08/25 It is another national scandal: Courts Service Covered Up IT Bug That Caused Evidence to Go Missing ” HMCTS leadership stands accused of “covering up” the flaw for several years.” and did not make the public aware of this. How are they even allowed to operate? Why would anyone trust them? Clearly; HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is not fit for purpose❗
“These hearings often decide the fate of people’s lives,” observed Sir James Munby, former head of the High Court Family Division, calling the situation “a scandal” and “shocking” . “An error could mean the difference between a child being removed from an unsafe environment or a vulnerable person missing out on benefits.” His words underscore the high stakes of such a failure. This wasn’t a trivial IT hiccup; it struck at the core of justice and public trust.” Written by John Barwell
16/08/25 Under the guise of deterring those who may wish to use companies for illegal purposes ( but only what authority criminals will ACKNOWLEDGE as being illegal) they are engaging in another unnecessary general; power /data grab/abuse by abusing their positions. The govts already illegally share any of our data from banks, companies etc amongst themselves and other ‘friends of govt’ therefore facilitating ID theft etc & they collect/promote dishonest persons along the way.
🔼🔼🔼changestoukcompanylaw.campaign.gov.uk refused to connect… because they hate my website for exposing those in power [the snakes who commit the most serious crimes themselves], are now apparently, denying me access to recent govt docs! That is fine, I already have exposed enough about their corruption in positions of office as do others💪💪💪 – including those I have shared information with – many years ago!
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/misconduct-public-office
We need to show them – who need the most scrutiny and immediate accountability for the mountain of crimes they have already committed & for deterrent purposes – LOCK THEM UP!
“Companies House will introduce a new identity verification process to help deter those wishing to use companies for illegal purposes.
Anyone setting up, running, owning or controlling a company in the UK will need to verify their identity to prove they are who they claim to be. Read the guidance on verifying your identity for Companies House.
Who needs to verify their identity
From 8 April 2025, individuals can voluntarily verify their identity. You can verify directly with Companies House through GOV.UK One Login, or through an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP).
From 18 November 2025, identity verification will be required for:
- new directors and people with significant control (PSCs)
- existing directors and PSCs
- members of a limited liability partnership (LLP)
We’ll introduce identity verification at a later date for:
- people who file at Companies House
- limited partnerships
- corporate directors of companies
- corporate members of LLPs
- officers of corporate PSCs ”
Page updated 12/09/25 Exposed: Why the CPS Fails to Prosecute Big UK Law Firms for Financial Crimes! by John Barwell
“Specific Issues with UK Law Firms
UK law firms, given their role in facilitating various transactions and providing legal advice, can sometimes be implicated in business crimes, such as facilitating money laundering or breaching fiduciary duties. Prosecuting these cases involves overcoming significant barriers:
- Legal Protection and Professional Privilege: Law firms often invoke legal professional privilege, which protects communications between lawyers and their clients. This can limit the CPS’s access to crucial evidence needed for prosecution (Politics.co.uk).
- Challenges in Proving Intentional Wrongdoing: Proving that law firms intentionally engaged in or facilitated criminal activities requires clear and compelling evidence of intent, which is often difficult to establish (StudySmarter UK).
- Case Studies and Examples: High-profile cases, such as those involving the Panama Papers, have highlighted the role of law firms in facilitating financial crimes. However, successful prosecutions have been rare, illustrating the difficulties the CPS faces in these complex and well-defended cases. –Written by John Barwell “
In Scotland, corruption greatly assists those in positions of trust – who wish to avoid accountability, and who have access to public cash or via illegally obtained assets. The individual members of the public trying to defend themselves; would have great difficulty in finding anyone who is not corrupted – from the police – right to the top of the Justice system.
COPS CASH TO LAWYERS: Scotland’s single Police Service name Law firms who were paid TWENTY FOUR million pounds – during last Three years of Iain Livingstone’s term as Police Scotland Chief Monday, December 11, 2023 from The Justice Diaries
“A growing chorus of whistleblowers, doctors, and legal professionals is calling for urgent action against Employment Judge Lancaster, who faces mounting allegations of bullying, bias, and judicial misconduct in the UK’s Employment Tribunal system. Despite a string of complaints, overturned judgments, and media exposés, the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) has so far refused to launch a full investigation—prompting campaigners to take the matter to court.” – John Barwell
Unmasking Accountability: Bailiffs and Due Diligence in UK Peaceful Re-entries
“In this case, Burnetts Solicitors and the landlord misrepresented facts to the bailiff, resulting in an unlawful lockout. The bailiff, acting on this misinformation, executed a peaceful re-entry without conducting the necessary due diligence. This action not only led to an unlawful eviction but also involved the bailiff interfering with the tenant’s CCTV system, further compounding the legal and ethical breaches.” – Written by John Barwell
Britain’s Accountability Crisis: From Grenfell to Whistleblowers, the System Is Failing
“The United Kingdom is in the throes of a national accountability crisis. Whether in the corridors of power or boardrooms of multinational corporations, a culture of impunity has taken root. Scandals like the Grenfell Tower fire, grooming gangs, and the Post Office Horizon debacle highlight systemic failures that leave victims without justice, while whistleblowers like Irina Woodhead face insurmountable obstacles when challenging corporate negligence.”
“…The Grenfell Tower fire, where 72 lives were lost due to decisions about unsafe cladding, serves as a grim example. Similarly, the grooming gang scandals reveal systemic negligence across police, social services, and local councils. Yet inquiries into these incidents have delivered little justice, with those responsible rarely facing prosecution or dismissal.
Public inquiries, while exposing failures, have become exercises in optics rather than accountability. Dr Ibrahim notes that in countries like the United States, such scandals would likely result in criminal charges and civil lawsuits. By contrast, the UK’s reliance on inquiries sends a clear message: failure is tolerated, if not rewarded…” – John Barwell
Employment Tribunals and the Lone Claimant: The Hidden Rules of Engagement
17/07/25 “As many of you know I have worked in this pocket of law for sometime now, I have watched Employment Tribunal cases implode—not because the claims lacked merit, but because the system overwhelmed people who tried to run their own litigation. Fees came and went; rules changed; remote hearings arrived. Yet the same patterns kept repeating: procedural ambushes, last-minute funding withdrawals, and victorious claimants left chasing unpaid awards.
This article distils that front-line experience. It is aimed at anyone contemplating an ET claim—especially those who may end up self-represented. Knowing the traps in advance will not eliminate the imbalance, but it can stop you falling into holes that have swallowed so many before you.” – John Barwell
07/05/2025 Legal Lens examines the life altering decisions being made against us, and offers solutions to bring about positive change. Unfortunately, this does not align with the agendas of those in charge of the UK. The trustworthy public need to remove them to positively shape our own lives, health, safety, security, quality of life, education, employment choices, etc and of those around us – by joining together to take control, at community level.
“The solution of the social problem is in liberty” – Frederic Bastiat
We need to make the decisions concerning our well being and that of our children – and no longer rely on those who refuse to work in our best interest. Instead, we should free ourselves from those who have already harmed so many.
“The real cost of the State is the prosperity we do not see, the jobs that don’t exist, the technologies to which we do not have access, the businesses that do not come into existence, and the bright future that is stolen from us. The State has looted us just as surely as a robber who enters our home at night and steals all that we love.” – Frédéric Bastiat
SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME STRATEGY 2023 TO 2028
CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME
Ch.2 CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME.
Page updated 07/07/25 Asset Laundering In The UK | Crime Under The Crown | The Corruption Capital of the World Video by Moconomy.
“Politically Exposed Persons…someone who holds a public function and as a result, presents a higher risk of being involved in bribery and corruption…” …and the evidence of this type of corruption; designed to Pervert the Course Of Justice; is especially rife amongst those who operate in the echelons of power.
Example The Solicitors Regulation Authority – SRA pretends to regulate the solicitors/law firms. They regulate themselves on behalf of the rest of the corrupt authorities/companies/organisations NGO’s etc…
“Summary of key points
Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are a misuse of the legal system, through bringing or threatening claims that are unmeritorious or characterised by abusive tactics, in order to stifle lawful scrutiny and publication, including on matters of corruption or wrongdoing. [The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) claim this behaviour to be unacceptable but no lawyers appear to have been held to account in criminal courts… which, is in the public interest – because no accountability means the practice will obviously continue].
“Our key messages for solicitors and law firms are:
particular care is required where a publication ventilates a matter that is likely to engage the public interest.
you must not bring or threaten unmeritorious claims or engage in tactics that are intimidatory or otherwise oppressive [examples; censoring/harassing/intimidating/coercing the public]
your duty to act in your client’s interest must be balanced with your wider professional obligations, including your duty to the courts and to uphold the rule of law, which take precedence should these come into conflict [the deeply corrupted courts who ignore the rule of law themselves]
you should identify proposed causes of action or behaviours which comprise a SLAPP or abuse of the litigation process, and decline to act in this way
The key aim of a SLAPP is to prevent publication of information that relates to a matter of public interest, such as academic research, whistleblowing or campaigning or journalism, by preventing the publication of public interest information or by removing information from the public domain.”
The SRA are working against the public interest by protecting the corruption of those in power and focusing on cover-ups. https://politicaldictionary.com/words/the-cover-up-is-worse-than-the-crime/
“The cover-up is worse than the crime” refers to the idea that attempts to conceal or obscure wrongdoing can lead to more severe consequences than the original misdeed.
This principle underscores the importance of transparency, accountability, and integrity in politics, suggesting that dishonesty in the aftermath of an error or crime often compounds the original offense, leading to greater political, legal, and ethical repercussions.” They should look in the mirror and practice what they preach.
Open Letter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority: A Call for Accountability and Reform by John Barwell
Q. So, when is the law, not the law❓ A. When it is not fit for purpose – because the decision makers are on the wrong side of the law.
Example: Throughout the UK: Designed to Fail – The Continuing Travesty of the Horizon Scandal by Professor Tim Wilson. “…This is a pattern. These scandals are not isolated blunders. They reveal a deeper pathology within our political and administrative culture…”
Corruption and Complicity: Misconduct by Solicitors in UK Employment Tribunals by John Barwell
“Over decades, some solicitors in the UK – especially those defending employers – have perfected ways to skirt the law and undermine the tribunal process. Through procedural tricks, gag orders, deliberate delays and conflicts of interest, these practitioners manipulate supposedly impartial proceedings to the detriment of vulnerable claimants. Meanwhile, the very watchdog meant to police the profession – the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) – stands accused of being asleep at the wheel. As one commentator bluntly observed, “the SRA is a total waste of time,” given its unwillingness to enforce meaningful consequences on rule-breaking lawyers”.
“Yet in practice, unscrupulous solicitors have turned ETs into minefields for ordinary workers. The imbalance of power is stark: employers often arrive armed with seasoned legal teams, while many employees struggle without representation.” by John Barwell
04/07/25 Did Parliament Just Change What MPs Do? by Craig Houston.
02/07/25 Please pay ATTENTION to this: Our politicians; enjoy making up & altering rules and laws to further their own criminal actions – and now have sneaked in a massive change in their job description. LET US DEMAND THE REMOVAL OF ALL THESE SELF-SERVING, PARISITIC CRIMINALS – NOW! Use their phone contact numbers and alert all the press/ social platforms/ regulators/ police and everywhere you can think of to bombard them with complaints and outrage. Provide a list of all the reasons they should be removed. Cause them chaos – for a change!
Now they boast: “What do MPs do?
”MPs work both at the UK Parliament and in their local constituencies. How and where they work is largely up to them to decide. There is no job description or contract of employment for MPs, nor any rules on how they should balance the competing demands of these two roles. However, MPs must abide by standards of conduct, rules and conventions. For more information see Accountability and Standards.
How an MP decides to divide their time can depend upon the schedule of business in the House of Commons, the distance of their constituency from London, their family responsibilities, or whether they have taken on additional responsibilities in the Commons or in the government.
If an MP has taken on an extra role in the House of Commons (such as a committee chair) or in government (such as a ministerial role), they may need to spend more time at Westminster particularly when the House is sitting.
MPs employ a small number of staff to assist with work at Parliament and help to run offices in the constituency. This allows work to continue in both settings while the MP travels between the two.
MPs at Parliament
In Parliament, MPs are expected to carry out the core work of the House of Commons:
- Legislation and taxation – examining and approving new laws or taxes
- Scrutiny – holding the government to account for its actions
- Debating – where competing viewpoints can be expressed and the concerns of constituents can be raised
Find out more at: What is the role of Parliament?
Although each MP is sent from one local area, at Parliament they may also consider the best interests of the entire nation.
MPs carry out their parliamentary work in the debating chambers and committee rooms of the House of Commons, and in their parliamentary offices. Apart from formal parliamentary events, MPs can attend private meetings during each week at Parliament. These may be meetings with representatives from industry, trade unions, campaigners, and lobbyists. They may also attend party meetings and meetings arranged by All-Party Parliamentary Groups.
MPs in their constituency
In their constituency, MPs can meet with local businesses and community groups, attend local events and visit schools, hospitals or job centres to see for themselves how services are being delivered. Conversations in their constituency can help to inform an MPs’ priorities when they are in Parliament.
An MP will often hold advice surgeries, either in person or online, in their constituency. Surgeries are an opportunity for local people to ask if their situation is one that the MP can help them with.
Dealing with cases that are raised by constituents in this way, or via emails and calls to their office, can take up much of an MP’s time when they are not busy with parliamentary work. Constituency office staff can assist with this caseload.”
HERE IS THE ORIGINAL VERSION:
“What do MPs do?
The UK public elects Members of Parliament (MPs) to represent their interests and concerns in the House of Commons. MPs consider and can propose new laws as well as raising issues that matter to you in the House. This includes asking government ministers questions about current issues including those which affect local constituents.
MPs split their time between working in Parliament itself, working in the constituency that elected them and working for their political party.
Some MPs from the governing party (or parties) become government ministers with specific responsibilities in certain areas, such as Health or Defence. These MPs do not stop working for their constituency and, whatever their role in Government or Parliament, will still hold regular surgeries to help their constituents.
What do MPs do in Parliament?
When Parliament is sitting (meeting), MPs generally spend their time working in the House of Commons. This can include raising issues affecting their constituents, attending debates and voting on new laws. This can either be by asking a question of a government minister on your behalf or supporting and highlighting particular campaigns which local people feel strongly about.
Most MPs are also members of committees, which look at issues in detail, from government policy and new laws, to wider topics like human rights.
What do MPs do in their constituency?
In their constituency, MPs often hold a ‘surgery’ in their office, where local people can come along to discuss any matters that concern them.
MPs also attend functions, visit schools and businesses and generally try to meet as many people as possible. This gives MPs further insight and context into issues they may discuss when they return to Westminster.
Who is your MP?
To find out who represents you and how to contact them, you can:
- Use the Find Your MP tool on the UK Parliament website
- Ring the House of Commons Enquiry Service on 020 7219 4272”
Perverting the Course of Justice
The offence of perverting the course of justice is committed when an accused:
- does an act or series of acts;
- which has or have a tendency to pervert; and
- which is or are intended to pervert;
- the course of public justice.
The course of justice must be in existence at the time of the act(s). The course of justice starts when:
- an event has occurred, from which it can reasonably be expected that an investigation will follow; or
- investigations which could/might bring proceedings have actually started; or
- proceedings have started or are about to start.
The course of justice refers to civil justice as well criminal justice.
I surmise they do not like my website very much!
Can You Sue for Narcissistic Abuse? Legal Grounds, Precedents & Case Studies by By Jack Hansen
“It’s crucial to remember that pursuing legal action against narcissistic abusers is not only about seeking compensation but also about holding them accountable for their harmful actions. With the right legal guidance and a strong case, justice can be served for those impacted by narcissistic abuse.“
Most of the public are victims of narcissistic/psychopathic abuse by those running (ruining) the UK: CORRUPTION/ NEGLECT/ SOCIAL MURDER/ SEXUAL/ PSYCHOLOGICAL/ PHYSICAL / FINANCIAL/ DATA/ SOCIAL ABUSE. With the sheer volume of evidence/knowledge to support a case, [readily available], I am highly surprised that the public en masse, have not sought to seek redress and justice. I can only assume that there are no ethical lawyers available any more, and, or that they have no experts in this field. It could be the answer to our problems, & around the world – by declaring the traitors, mentally unfit for public office – because they are demonstrating they have serious personality disorders.
The Danger of Dark Triad Leaders by Steve Taylor Ph.D. Psychology Today.
“There is a terrible destructiveness at the heart of dark triad leaders. Perhaps because they live in a state of complete disconnection, and feel a deep sense of lack, they feel a deep malevolence towards the world, and other human beings. It’s almost as if they are on a mission to cause as much as chaos and devastation as possible while in power — to kill people, to bomb countries, to destroy institutions, to damage the environment, or to roll back rights and regulations.” Sounds familiar doesn’t it?
10/06/2025 – URGENT❗ STOP THEM BEFORE THEY STOP US❗
Government wants to spy on your bank account – we must stop them video by Big Brother Watch
08/06/25Perhaps all the decision makers should regularly be reminded; that under Articles 7 of THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (UDOHR) ” All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.” but this declaration, like many of the laws, are only being used against the public.
“The Care Quality Commission and NHS England must adopt a more zero-tolerance stance: any facility found to have abused patients should face immediate sanctions, from management removal to closure if necessary. Legal accountability should also be heightened. Where systemic abuse is uncovered, not only front-line staff but executives could face consequences for corporate manslaughter or neglect. The law already allows prosecution of care providers for organisational failures leading to abuse; using these powers more could jolt others into compliance. Likewise, professional regulators like the GMC and Nursing and Midwifery Council should err on the side of patient safety – if in doubt, suspend or remove practitioners with violent or sexual offences in their background, with a clear path for public disclosure. The public has a right to know if their healthcare provider has a history that could endanger them . Changing the norm to greater transparency will incentivise better behaviour (for example, if doctors know any conviction will likely end their career, the deterrent effect is powerful).” by John Barwell
“2. Responsible Officers: Vast Powers, Few Safeguards by John Barwell
The RO holds gatekeeping power. Without their recommendation, a doctor cannot revalidate—and may be suspended from clinical work. In most NHS bodies, the dual role of RO and Medical Director creates a profound conflict: the same person who manages performance may also be the subject of serious concerns.
There is:
- No statutory requirement for an RO to have a clean fitness to practise (FtP) record;
- No public register of ROs or public data on concerns raised about them;
- No transparent challenge process unless the matter escalates to a full GMC investigation.
As a result, whistleblowing doctors may find themselves assessed—and possibly sanctioned—by the very senior official whose behaviour they have reported. This is not independent oversight. It is an internal loop of unaccountable authority.”
See also UNVEILING THE SCANDAL BEHIND THE SCENES IN THE NHS All is not what it seems and certainly not how it should be. This is despite £multibillions allocated, it does not appear to be proportionally spent on patient care and high calibre staff. Otherwise, standards of health & social care would not have deteriorated so much. How much money from the budget is allocated to health ministers/ chiefs/directors/regulators/admin etc – compared with the amount provided for actual medical staff and equipment? It is time to stop running it as a business and prioritise affordable and professional healthcare as an essential service to the public – who have paid for it.
“Genuine human rights protections require transparency, accountability, and robust enforcement—without these, rights become meaningless. We must constantly challenge those in power, ensuring legal frameworks serve the people, not the powerful. Only then can we build a fairer, more compassionate society.” — John Barwell
“A Blueprint for Change – by John Barwell
- Make enforcement accessible. Tribunal and county-court routes should not rely on private cash. Restoring legal-aid scope for education, community-care and discrimination claims would transform access to justice. In parallel, regulators such as OFSTED, HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the Independent Office for Police Conduct must be instructed to treat Equality Act compliance as a key performance indicator, publishing breaches alongside exam results or crime detection data…”
“The systemic failure here is twofold: suppression of legitimate dissent and distraction from accountability – by John Barwell
In recent years, identity politics – advocacy or political stances based on characteristics like gender, race, sexuality, etc. – has become a dominant force in public discourse. At its best, it can amplify marginalised voices and address historical injustices. But when weaponised, identity politics can be used to silence debate, discredit individuals unfairly, or distract from substantive issues. This weaponisation often involves accusing critics or whistleblowers of bigotry (racism, transphobia, etc.) not because they are actually motivated by hate, but to put them on the defensive and deter others from listening to their message. In the UK, this dynamic has played out in multiple contexts – for example, a woman raising concerns about a policy that she feels endangers female service users might be branded a transphobe if that policy relates to gender identity, thereby shifting focus from her actual argument to an attack on her character…”
Updated 13/06/25 Global psychopathic manipulation by Dr John Campbell and his guest “doctor, endocrinologist, author, medical researcher and teacher, professor David Anderson” – discussing how our very existence is under threat.
Coordinated actions by our dysfunctional, controlling leaders & their enablers around the world; have resulted in many of the worst personality types acquiring positions of trust, [they pass the jobs around amongst themselves]. They are happy to destroy whoever and whatever it takes – to satisfy their own goals. The warning signs were missed and now we have to quickly take action to deal with the aftermath. It should now be abundantly clear to everyone, there is no-one in any authority position; going to help the public.
“Some people try to be tall by cutting off the heads of others!” ― Paramahansa Yogananda
8 Ways Gaslighters Manipulate and Control Relationships How gaslighters traumatize and exploit victims to achieve their goals. by Preston Ni M.S.B.A.
“Examples of gaslighting include companies that advertise addictive products to children, politicians who scapegoat entire groups to divide the community, media talking heads who espouse hate to gain notoriety, executives who exploit employees for profitability, and relational abusers who blame their victims for victimization. Gaslighting is psychological violence.”
“Systemic Failings – by John Barwell
The presence of psychopathic or narcissistic leaders in institutions can lead to systemic failings that echo the leader’s traits. A common pattern is a culture of fear and silence. Such leaders often retaliate viciously against critics and surround themselves with loyalists who share or tolerate their mindset . Employees in these environments quickly learn not to question decisions or report problems, for fear of being punished or ostracised. This means misconduct by the leader or those protected by the leader goes unchecked. In a hospital context, for instance, a chief executive with a bullying, egocentric style might dismiss patient complaints or staff concerns to protect the hospital’s image (and by extension their own), leading to ongoing patient harm that staff are too intimidated to escalate. In a corporate setting, a “corporate psychopath” CEO might push unethical practices (like cutting safety corners or deceiving clients) to boost short-term metrics that glorify them, while discouraging any moral objections from subordinates.”
“Systemic Failures – by John Barwell
One systemic failure in recent sexual abuse cases is the ignoring of red flags due to institutional self-protection. Time and again, reports show that victims (often children or vulnerable patients) did report abuse to someone – a teacher, a social worker, the police – but their accounts were minimised or disbelieved. In the case of child grooming gangs (like in Rotherham between the 1990s-2010s), hundreds of predominantly underage girls were sexually exploited, and while many had tried to seek help, authorities were slow or reluctant to act. An independent inquiry by Alexis Jay in 2014 concluded that police and council officials had ignored or downplayed reports for fear of rocking community relations (since many perpetrators were from Pakistani heritage communities) and disbelief that such horrible abuse could be so widespread . The failure here was multi-layered: prejudice (the girls were often from troubled backgrounds, leading to victim-blaming), fear of political controversy, and inertia.”
Those who have been running (ruining) the UK for decades have proven, ‘beyond a shadow of doubt’; that they were/are only interested in the exploitation of the masses (& throughout the world). Societal issues do not resolve themselves, it takes ethical, competent, and dedicated individuals working together as part of a team – to benefit the whole population.
“Pathways to Reform – by John Barwell
Emphasising that truly ethical leadership is about preventing scandals rather than just managing them when exposed is key. When leaders internalise that their legacy and honour depend on actively rooting out corruption and abuse on their watch, not on the false sheen of “everything is fine,” the enabling will lessen. Many of these reforms are about sending a clear message: in the UK’s modern governance, ethical leadership is not optional. By instituting tougher accountability structures and championing moral governance, the hope is to cultivate leaders who act as true guardians against systemic abuse, rather than silent accomplices to it.”
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
https://unfoundation.org/blog/post/9-inspiring-malala-quotes
Quotes below are by Malala Yousafzai
“One child, one teacher, one pen, and one book can change the world.” (Tweet this)
“Some people only ask others to do something. I believe that, why should I wait for someone else? Why don’t I take a step and move forward?” (Tweet this)
“I truly believe the only way we can create global peace is through not only educating our minds, but our hearts and our souls.” (Tweet this)
“Let us make our future now, and let us make our dreams tomorrow’s reality.” (Tweet this)
“So let us wage a global struggle against illiteracy, poverty, and terrorism, and let us pick up our books and pens. They are our most powerful weapons.” (Tweet this)
“If we want to achieve our goal, then let us empower ourselves with the weapon of knowledge and let us shield ourselves with unity and togetherness.” (Tweet this)
“If people were silent, nothing would change.” (Tweet this)
“When the whole world is silent, even one voice becomes powerful.” (Tweet this)
“We want schools and education for every child’s bright future. We will continue our journey to our destination of peace and education for everyone.” (Tweet this)
