The UDOHR was made at a time when there were enough trustworthy persons holding positions of trust; to prevent the worst crimes against humanity. It is no longer the case. We have pseudo-professionals who could be compared with having the moral compass of a sewer rat – however, I do not want to offend the four legged rats! They have not destroyed the lives of millions of people in the UK, but the decision makers in authority positions most certainly have, because they chose to do so! It is all about CONTROL-them master – you slave- or dead.
Updated page 05/02/25 Q. When is the law, not the law A. When all those – whose job it is to uphold the law, are too busy breaking it – & are altering or introducing more legislation – to facilitate total control of every aspect of our lives and for them to avoid accountability. Example the latest version of the Human Rights Act 1998. Please ‘read between the lines‘ and prepare in advance what to say, when they attempt to stitch you up. Do not admit guilt to any of the more recent laws by the psychos who call themselves a govt!
Remember they word it serve themselves, and much of their behaviour/actions are criminal/irrational/ cruel/ dangerous/ evil etc -such as treating transwomen as natural women, it being acceptable to mutilate children to change their gender, prioritising perpetrators rights before the suffering/injury of victims, arresting citizens for speech about topics such as race, whilst allowing rapists to stay in the community etc.
Try to find original versions in archives which are hidden from the public, Compare their actions with UDOHR
1 Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.
The govt and their enablers are the ones putting our lives at risk❗
2 Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
(a)in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
(b)in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained;
(c)in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.
Article 3 Prohibition of torture
No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 4 Prohibition of slavery and forced labour
1 No one shall be held in slavery or servitude.
2 No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour.
3 For the purpose of this Article the term “forced or compulsory labour” shall not include:
(a)any work required to be done in the ordinary course of detention imposed according to the provisions of Article 5 of this Convention or during conditional release from such detention;
(b)any service of a military character or, in case of conscientious objectors in countries where they are recognised, service exacted instead of compulsory military service;
(c)any service exacted in case of an emergency or calamity threatening the life or well-being of the community;
(d)any work or service which forms part of normal civic obligations.
Article 5 Right to liberty and security
1 Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law:
(a)the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court;
(b)the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law;
(c)the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so;
(d)the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority;
(e)the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants;
(f)the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition.
2 Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him.
3 Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1(c) of this Article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial. Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.
4 Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful.
5 Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.
Article 6 Right to a fair trial
1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.
2 Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
3 Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
(a)to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
(b)to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
(c)to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
(d)to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
(e)to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.
Article 7 No punishment without law
1 No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.
2 This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.
Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life
1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Article 9 Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
1 Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
2 Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Article 10 Freedom of expression
1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
2 The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association
1 Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
2 No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This Article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the State.
Article 12 Right to marry
Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right.
[article 13 is currently missing from this copy from here, it is about freedom of movement within the borders of each state]
Article 14 Prohibition of discrimination
The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.
Article 16 Restrictions on political activity of aliens
Nothing in Articles 10, 11 and 14 shall be regarded as preventing the High Contracting Parties from imposing restrictions on the political activity of aliens.
Article 17 Prohibition of abuse of rights
Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.
Article 18 Limitation on use of restrictions on rights
The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they have been prescribed.
Part II The First Protocol
Article 1 Protection of property
Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.
The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.
Article 2 Right to education
No person shall be denied the right to education. In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.
Article 3 Right to free elections
The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature.
[F1PART 3ARTICLE 1 OF THE THIRTEENTH PROTOCOL Abolition of the death penalty
Here is a prime example of how the corrupt UK govts: whose decisions are the cause and effect of all the manufactured crises the public are currently facing, because they are operating under false pretences and engage in actions, that are identical to the definition of an organised crime syndicate. They then attempt to deflect attention away from themselves and onto others.
“Chapter 1: Ministerial Foreword
Crimedestroys lives and devastates communities. Serious and organised crime brings harm on a scale that can threaten national security. It also creates and fosters a self-reinforcing environment of criminality. Corruption and illicit finance undermine democracies and pose a threat to global security. It challenges the legitimacy of the Crown. To further complicate matters, the lines between organised criminals and state actors are sometimes blurred.
Criminal networks are increasingly sophisticated, often concealed, and make full use of modern technology. They exploit the internet, often operating across borders and without concern for human life.”
They do not have a legal or moral right to be in their positions of trust; as they invalidated their rights to govern & make or alter legislation – the moment they became criminals and promoted crime themselves❗
Firstly, the comments made about a noise appearing on the first attempt by Demirep; to produce the video, was not present when I watched it and may be another attempt of censoring [an anomaly – aka another dirty tactic] to stop the public viewing it, and may only be present on her computer – to persuade ‘Grannieopteryx’ to abandon uploading it!
I always enjoy videos which encourage critical thinking skills during a discussion; especially about the very important decisions made on matters which affect all of us and not just the individuals cultural choices. I agree that anyone coming to live in the UK should have to integrate with our social niceties/ethical culture & laws [but not the so called ‘new normal’], and no one should be allowed to force their different cultural views onto anyone else, [which would never be allowed if we tried to live in their country of origin]. It should be part of their terms of acceptance here. I also agree with the MP; speaking ina mainly empty, debate chamber [❗]- about the approach in dealing with these particular issues of bigamy/incest etc should be considered less of a criminal issue – because they have been indoctrinated into these particular patterns of behaviour. It should be more sensitively handled through a health and social education – which I believe should be mandatory.Muslims can then make informed choices; which allow them to stay and abide by our terms or leave.
12/09/24 …and now they are attempting to murder the pensioners again (easy targets for state criminals), by reducing their income to starve, cause hypothermia, removing bus passes so they cannot seek support or a heating source elsewhere etc., because the criminal bullies always attack the most vulnerable first. They have already been removing incomes from the sick and disabled for over a decade to bring about premature death. SOCIAL MURDER = more money for state parasites. These are reasons we should hold back council tax until only trustworthy people [ & accountable to us], are in charge of the public purse.
Who is the next target group in their bid to eradicate the masses❓
“Keir Starmer was last night under fire over donations to Labour from a key Just Stop Oil funder. The party was challenged to distance itself from the eco-zealots by returning the £1.5million given to it by green energy boss Dale Vince. He has helped bankroll the controversial climate activist group since its inception just over a year ago.”
The public have already been pushed into extreme, life-threatening levels of poverty to massively increase profits of greedy energy companies, to support the artificially inflated cost of living and now want to import more expensive energy from abroad from ‘foreign greedy, friends of govt’.
I also doubt Putin blew up his own Nord Stream Pipelines in 2022, when he had a huge financial hold over other countries. Maybe one of our fake leaders – money laundered some more of the tax payers money to bribe another country, eg Ukraine – to do the dirty work🤔🤔🤔
The World Economic Forum (WEF) is a festering, toxic, can of worms filled with malignant narcissists and psychopaths. ‘The Great Reset’… ‘The New Normal’ etc., means United Nations (UN), World Health Organisation (WHO), Corporate, Pharma, Techy giants, Mainstream Mediaand all the other carefully chosen global self-titled elites,are colluding with our deeply corrupted, authoritarian governmentswith one main agenda: to control the economy and every aspect of our lives. The WEF has even bragged about infiltrating the governments, it is no longer a secret where our treacherous politicians loyalty lies, and it is not with the countries they have refused to serve. They are only interested in serving themselves with our money, which for decades has been ‘squirrelled away’ under the guise of whatever lame excuse they decide.
THE 4 STAGES OF IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION – PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
06/08/24 Our dysfunctional leaders, are all part of the New Normal, Great Reset; converting rational into irrational behaviour, introducing dangerous policies to deliberately cause chaos and great harm, to serve the toxic agendas of the rest of the members of The World Economic Forum and so-called global elite. 4 Stages of Ideological Subversion psychological warfare; by Yuri Bezmenov– a Soviet journalist and a former KGB agent.
“Stage 1: Demoralization – Demoralization is the first stage of ideological subversion, and it involves the systematic undermining of a society’s moral and ethical foundations...
…In the demoralization phase, individuals are conditioned to question their own cultural identity, history, and societal norms…”
“Stage 2: Destabilization – This phase is characterized by the weakening of essential institutions and structures within the society…
…Key sectors such as law enforcement, military, and intelligence are targeted to compromise the nation’s ability to respond to external and internal threats…”
“Stage 3: Crisis – By this point, the society is in a state of chaos, with heightened tension and a breakdown of trust in institutions...
…This creates an opportunity for a shift in power dynamics and the imposition of foreign ideologies on the now susceptible population.”
“Stage 4: Normalization – Bezmenov emphasized that this phase is not about a return to stability but rather the establishment of a new societal order based on the foreign ideology. The once-targeted society is now reshaped according to the infiltrating force’s vision, erasing its original cultural identity and values…
…Normalization solidifies the control of the foreign ideology, and the population may no longer resist as the altered reality becomes accepted and internalized…”
“Yuri Bezmenov’s insights into the stages of ideological subversion remain relevant, serving as a cautionary reminder of the importance of preserving the values, institutions, and cultural identity that define a nation. Understanding these stages provides a framework for RECOGNIZING AND COUNTERING potential THREATS to the integrity of a society.”
“Articles 1 and 13 of the ECHR do not feature in the Act. This is because, by creating the Human Rights Act, the UK has fulfilled these rights.
For example, Article 1 says that states must secure the rights of the Convention in their own jurisdiction. The Human Rights Act is the main way of doing this for the UK.
Article 13 makes sure that if people’s rights are violated they are able to access effective remedy. This means they can take their case to court to seek a judgment. The Human Rights Act is designed to make sure this happens“.
But, the tyrants are ignoring all our rights/laws by putting every obstacle in our way so we cannot defend ourselves.
“Public bodies must respect your rights. It requires all public bodies (like courts, police, local authorities, hospitals and publicly funded schools) and other bodies carrying out public functions to respect and protect your human rights”
The good members of the public 💪💪💪👏in Scotland have spoken up to expose the human right abuses the Scottish govt forced upon its citizens during the pandemic. The decision-makers have no moral compass and do not bide by any legislation, but only use policies and legislation against the public. It is a fact!
The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group article by Stephen Lendman from Global Research, is a review on the book and many years research by Daniel Estulin and compare with what they have been forcing upon us. The schemers have BETRAYED US. It was deliberate and premeditated.
I would like many members of the public to compare the list below taken from the article, with what has already happened and future plans for us and add evidence next to each of the Bilderberg Objectives to share on social platforms and for future reference – I am blocked. [Shhh, google has recently allowed my website some recognition after completely blocking it for many months…dare I believe they do have some conscience left?]
Quote “The Group’s grand design is for “a One World Government (World Company) with a single, global marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially regulated by one ‘World (Central) Bank’ using one global currency.” [CBDC?) Their “wish list” includes:
— “one international identify (observing) one set of universal values;”
— centralized control of world populations by “mind control;” in other words, controlling world public opinion;
— a New World Order with no middle class, only “rulers and servants (serfs),” and, of course, no democracy;
— “a zero-growth society” without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the rulers;
— manufactured crises and perpetual wars;
— absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;
— “centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies;” one size fits all globally;
— using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on “world citizens;”
— expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;
— making NATO a world military;
— imposing a universal legal system; and
major 🚩”— a global “welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for extermination.”
“Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided “to create an ‘Aristocracy of purpose’ between Europe and the United States (to reach consensus to rule the world on matters of) policy, economics, and (overall) strategy.” NATO was essential for their plans – to ensure “perpetual war (and) nuclear blackmail” to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it.“
“…at the 1992 Bilderberg Group meeting, Henry Kissinger said:
“Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were toldthere was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.”
You are deliberately being manipulated…to serve the least trustworthy, exploitative traitors, ever to walk the planet.
We do not want fake leaders continuing to ruin our lives to bring about our untimely death. They have been spoon feeding us lies from their very existence. But, the pathological liars, no longer have any credibility. Please do not comply with their orders. Please do not vote for any of them; as the public MUST UNITE WITHOUT THEIR INTERFERENCE, to enable us to manage our own affairs and create a more prosperous and safer future for all our families. They have not and will never care about us.
In addition they are teaching kids in schools to be victims of sexual abuse to cater for the paedophiles and rapists who they are supporting in the communities.
The UK government want to remove/replace our Human Rights laws using the deportation of illegal immigrants as an excuse, but they denied genuine refugees legal access. The despots made numerous and unnecessary laws to oppress the rest of us, working against our interest, yet claim they cannot remove illegal immigrants. There is a sinister agenda here and the WEF will be behind it. Destroying current communities will be a big part of it.
Many UK residents live in very damp unhealthy conditions and others can’t find a home so are forced to live rough. Many tenants/homeowners are removed from their homes by state thugs [the bailiffs and police who are interfering with civil rights- but ignore criminal laws], because their income cannot keep up with the artificially inflated cost of living. Human Rights have been ignored for many years, because the so-called ministers, and regulators, only pretend to do their (well paid) jobs.
The evidence that shows Tory Party corruption is not only rife but endemic – Canary (thecanary.co)The main coronavirus Test and Trace contract went to Sitel and Serco. Serco’s CEO Rupert Soames is the brother of former Tory MP Nicholas Soames. And Dido Harding, former head of the disastrous Test and Trace project, is a Tory peer. Corrupt thieving politicians make a lot of money from dodgy contracts, so most of the contracts must be dodgy. Toxic greedy leaders etc are not going to surround themselves with upstanding citizens or companies who will expose them.
“We define corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain”.
“Corruption erodes trust, weakens democracy, hampers economic development and further exacerbates inequality, poverty, social division and the environmental crisis.”
14.04.24. I think ‘this is not as it seems’! The ‘cherry picking’ ECHR has ignored really serious human rights abuses in the UK and elsewhere, for many years [including a very recent one brought against the DWP].
My gut instinct tells me the real reason the Swiss women won, and MSM are latching on to it, (when they usually do not care about the public), has more to do with the fact it serves the climate change agendaof our hypocritical leaders. They will use it to their advantage.
REWRITING THE RULE OF LAW, allows those in positions of power who are morally devoid, to regulate themselves and punish/protect whoever they like, without any conscience or accountability.
Corrupt officials are promoted/rewarded but real professionals, like Magistrate Kaira McCallum who actually do their jobs in the public interest, are treated badly (sacked), to protect the authority criminals & their enablers. It just confirms the UK is run by criminals in suits! The public need to take on the role of upholding the law in the nations interest.
Q’s. If the govt had nothing to fear, why do they have to engage in ‘dirty tricks’ to avoid accountability?Why did they not allow a legal proceeding to take place?A... because the corrupt Ministers & Co, do not have a legal or moral leg to stand on and if there was any real justice left in the UK, they would be all sent to prison for a very long time, for malicious intent to harm/social murder/acts of terrorism/ sexual/psychological abuse/financial abuse etc.
The crooked SNP ( just like in Westminster), actually select unscrupulous or weak members of the judiciary who will follow orders to their mutual benefit e.g. promotion/financial perks etc. The fact they are allowed to do this, because no authority working within government prevents it, proves the whole system is putrid!
Article 10 , like many human rights, is repeatedly abused by the authorities who instruct their friends in big techy companies to censor the public online, to control the narrative and replace with their propaganda.
The SNP party who has promoted division with its own hate speech, including directly at the English to further Nicola Sturgeon’s obsession to gain more power/control, by breaking up the UK (and to ensure less scrutiny for her and ‘friends of govt’). They introduced legislation to silence anyone who disagrees with her/them and is an abuse of Article 10: Freedom of expression and other Human Rights Laws. It also contradicts their previous statement below – because they make it up as they go along.
Teachers have already been encouraged to inappropriately, quiz children in the classroom. Please teach your kids to avoid giving out any personal/sensitive information to them. You have no control over what authorities are doing with the data.
Remember: Community spirit is the enemy of the tyrants. Home watch schemes will help protect you all and bring you closer together as a team, rather than as individuals (who are easier to make victims) with no support.
