NO TAX FOR WAR : “ EXTRACTS OF LAW GOVERNING WAR AND ITS FUNDING“
In 2001 the UK and Scottish Governments ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court by enacting the International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001. This Act stipulates that: It shall be an offence for a person to engage in conduct ancillary to genocide, a crime against humanity or a war crime…
7 Meaning of “ancillary offence”: References … to an ancillary offence are to (a) being art and part in the commission of an offence; (b) inciting a person to commit an offence; (c) attempting or conspiring to commit an offence; …
8 Mental element: a person is regarded as committing such an act or crime only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge. … A person has intent in relation to conduct, where he means to engage in the conduct, and in relation to a consequence … is aware that it will occur in the ordinary course of events; and “knowledge” means awareness that a circumstance exists or a consequence will occur in the ordinary course of events.
29 Crown application: This Act binds the Crown and applies to persons in the public service of the Crown, and property [taxes] held for the purposes of the public service of the Crown, as it applies to other persons [taxpayers] and property.“
Earlier in 2026, I downloaded the Scotland Pack of council tax trust template and documents, from NO TAX FOR WAR & followed the instructions. I sent copies to HMRC, Angus Council, RBS [NatWest Group] and Octopus Energy using the signed for postal service; dated 26/01/26. I also opened a separate bank account to divert funds for the taxes I was withholding [not refusing to pay]; until the primary beneficiaries have met all the Taxation Trust conditions. All they had to do was reply – stating that I would not be aiding and abetting (Art & Part in Scotland) by them denying with evidence; exactly where my money was being used and that they were not using consolidated public funds for warfare, Genocide, Crimes Against humanity, Acts of terrorism etc or other criminal offences.
I received a response from Angus council, dated 30/01/26 who ignored the Trust Deed & the legislation on funding illegal wars etc., and just latched onto what they said I owed them with a council tax reminder.
Mr. Keith Airlie from the Executive Response Team on behalf of the NatWest Group, sent me a reply dated 03/02/26 stating; “As a regulated bank we must follow UK Law and the instructions we receive from authorised bodies including HMRC…” Except none of the authorities & their enablers are abiding by laws and the only way they all are avoiding accountability – is because they have corrupted everything from the top down. They are also coercing the public into aiding abetting the laws they break – so they can fund their abuse of public money/criminal agendas and to use influence to avoid accountability for their wrongdoing.
Octopus Energy did not even bother to reply; but still charged me VAT. I presume they expect HMRC to cover their back.
https://notaxforwar.com/how-tax-trusts-work/
At the end of the tax year 2026, I sent them letters stating they had failed to meet the conditions so the trust has been terminated for that period. I then started all over again with a new Trust Deed for the year ending April 05 2027.
HMRC replied; as can be seen in the copy below turning my trust deed into a complaint: It was an attempt to deflect away from answering; my Trust Deed Conditions – with no evidence of what the alleged complaint was about.
Keith Airlie from the NatWestGroup sent me a second letter dated 08/04/26 (As I rely on others to help with redacting etc and we run out of time to upload this particular letter).
Extract: …”Unfortunately, we are not able to vary, delay, or decline lawful requests or liabilities based on private trust arrangements or personal conditions set by an account holder. Where HMRC or another legally authorised organisation issues a valid instruction, we are required to act in accordance with that instruction”
I beg to differ, when authorities/organisations are obviously corrupt, they do not have a legal/moral right to stay in position or claim to have legitimacy.”
11/05/26 TWO UNSIGNED INTIMIDATION letters from ANGUS COUNCIL:
Letter(s) dated 06/05/26 did not receive until 11/05/26
In answer to their threats: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights because they are trying to deny us all our Human Rights to leave us completely defenceless.
Article 2
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Article 5
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 10
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11
- Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
- No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.
…Just a few of the articles which apply to this situation. Remember, I have not said I am not paying, I just said I am withholding it until they can prove they are not using consolidated taxes to fund illegal wars and other crimes.
They are punishing those who will not comply with their demands, even though many of the authority bullies themselves deliberately avoid taxation, misappropriate public funds, & more whilst so called regulators, checks and balances just look away – making them complicit.
My response 🔽🔽🔽 to their letters; I cannot access Post Office services easily and each letter I sent has cost me between £3.60 to £3.80 per letter to be signed for. Usually, any communication sent via standard mail to authorities – which they do not want to answer – results in them denying they have received it, therefore forcing members of the public to pay for them to be signed for.
Here is my open request to HMRC Angus Council, RBS, and Octopus Energy.
I would like all my human rights to be recognised in an uncorrupted court, including the right to a fair trial before the so-called authorities steal any money from the bank and or take any other brutal actions against me. My website serves as my evidence/defence and attempts to interfere with it – will be construed as: Attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice / Attempting to Defeat the Ends of Justice & more.
A fair and public hearing – Article 6 EHRC
“Article 6 protects your right to a fair trial
You have the right to a fair and public trial or hearing if: you are charged with a criminal offence and have to go to court, or
a public authority is making a decision that has an impact on your civil rights or obligations.
You have the right to a fair and public hearing that:
- is held within a reasonable time
- is heard by an independent and impartial decision-maker
- gives you all the relevant information
- is open to the public (although the press and public can be excluded for highly sensitive cases)
- allows you representation and an interpreter where appropriate, and
- is followed by a public decision.
You also have the right to an explanation of how the court or decision-making authority reached its decision.”
Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”) Amnesty Speaker Programme – FACT SHEET
“The HRA applies to Scotland in exactly the same way as it does to the rest of the UK. Scottish
public authorities, Scottish courts and tribunals, and persons in Scotland certain of whose functions
are of a public nature, must act in a way that is compatible with the human rights set out in Schedule
1 to the HRA (“Convention rights”). A failure to do so can result in the Scottish courts granting any
relief or remedy that it considers just and appropriate, including an order requiring the public
authority decision maker to retake their decision…
‘No power to make laws which are incompatible with human rights
‘No power for Scottish Ministers to act incompatibly with human rights‘
…The Scottish Parliament has not been given the power to make laws that breach human rights. Section 29 of the Scotland Act ensures that any SP Act passed by the Scottish Parliament is not law to the extent it is incompatible with any of the Convention rights in the HRA. This is because passing such a law would be outside the legislative competence granted to the Scottish Parliament by the Scotland Act. In cases where the legality of a SP Act, or a particular provision of it, is challenged on this basis, the High Court of Justiciary, the Court of Session and the Supreme Court each have the power to strike down the relevant SP Act or provision on the grounds that is outside the competence of the Scottish Parliament.”
LAW BREAKING – CALEDONIA HOUSING ASSOCIATION – when the law is not the law!
Ch.5 THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES.
SAR/ STUDENT LOAN COMPANY
I have also, recently obtained a correspondence from the Students Loan Company, yet they have not specified the amount or details on what they believe I owe. They are requesting that I provide information, suggesting that ‘my repayments could increase if I fail to respond’. To begin with, I am a non-working pensioner, and as stated on https://www.mygov.scot/repay-student-loan “you will not start making payments until you earn more than a certain amount of money, known as a ‘salary threshold’. The salary threshold is currently £32,745.” I have never earned this amount or any amount it was originally set as despite being qualified staff.
I will not waste my time replying in writing, especially as many authorities have demonstrated to me with evidence over the past 40+ years; that they are untrustworthy regarding data collection and other matters. They disseminate our personal and sensitive information at will, they even falsify records and smear decent citizens, to get a result. Recently, the Scottish authorities have denied [not for the first time!], my legal entitlement to a Subject Access Request to ascertain what information they hold; and to whom they shared it. They collect our data for their own purposes, which include exploiting and abusing the data subjects (mainly the general public), protected by the ‘pretendy’ regulator – the ICO – who sanction the data breaches and lawbreaking of those who abuse it.
The authorities & their enablers are engaging in actions to spy on us all, and share/steal our data without our consent, behind our backs – whilst misappropriating public money which they collected under false pretences; to keep themselves relevant and to increase their own wealth, using influence to avoid accountability. They also use it to pay for the finest lawyers, whilst ensuring the public either have to raise funds themselves for legal advice/representation, or do without. The authorities & co also have a history of intimidating/or bribing anyone who comes up against them. The UK is in collusion with many equally unscrupulous, individuals in companies, and organizations, including so-called charities, who make money from government influence, but often pretend to be ‘independent’. All these people lack integrity.
Ch. 4 THE DIGITAL ID TRAP – Another power grab to abuse & exploit the public.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/uk-biobank-data-breach-china-37060813 “Half a million Brits have had their personal health and genetic data listed for sale on a Chinese website. The Government has launched an investigation and called the breach from the pioneering UK Biobank project an “unacceptable abuse” of its data. Volunteer participants have for two decades contributed DNA samples as well as personal information to create the world’s most comprehensive dataset of biological, health and lifestyle information. Technology minister Ian Murray said the data was found listed for sale on the website Alibaba after it had been legitimately downloaded by three research institutions in China which have since had their access revoked.”
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/may/27/nhs-data-breach-trusts-shared-patient-details-with-facebook-meta-without-consent “NHS trusts are sharing intimate details about patients’ medical conditions, appointments and treatments with Facebook without consent and despite promising never to do so.”
