“One of a narcissist’s favourite games is creating havoc for others. They get a kick out of seeing other people struggle, while they can sit back and revel in the destruction and feel superior. They want to control and manipulate other people to get this sense of supremacy, whether it’s at work, in a romantic relationship, or within a family.”<\/em> – By Lindsay Dodgson<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n CHA have charitable status.\u00a0Charity commission\u00a0\u00a0OSCR | Home<\/a>\u00a0Caledonia Housing Association Limited, charity no\u00a0SC013988 CHA claim: Purposes:\u00a0\u201cThe relief of those in need by reason of age, ill health, disability, financial hardship or other disadvantage Beneficiaries: Older people, People with disabilities or health problems, No specific group, or for the benefit of the community.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n I guess the bullies at CHA, wants service users, who are easy to exploit and take advantage of just like any other professional con artist, because there is nothing charitable about how CHA conducts their business. The Caledonia Housing Association mantra<\/em> \u2018no evidence means no case\u2019<\/em> is right across the board in everything they do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n CHA (just like their enablers) has social, moral, legal, and financial obligations, yet does the reverse of what is expected of them and in doing so, are promoting crime by prioritising, and protecting the interests of the anti-social tenants.\u00a0<\/strong>It does not make the workload of the police, or the courts any easier, and is highly suspicious behaviour which warrants investigation<\/strong>. This formed the basis of my complaint sent to Business Service Director Garry Savage<\/strong>, but he omitted from his complaint procedure response (see chapter 6), to control the complaint by misrepresenting the facts. They do this a lot. It is fraud:\u00a0 \u00a0Fraud \u2013 Crime.Scot<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0 by Andrew Crosbie<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cFraud is a dishonestly-made false pretence, in order to bring about a practical result\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Updated<\/strong> page<\/strong> 29\/07\/25<\/p>\n\n\n\n FRAUD ACT 2006 1 Fraud<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n (1)A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed in subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).<\/p>\n\n\n\n (2)The sections are\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n (a)section 2 (fraud by false representation),<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n (b)section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n (c)section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n (3)A person who is guilty of fraud is liable\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n (a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding [F1<\/a>the general limit in a magistrates\u2019 court] or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);<\/p>\n\n\n\n (b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).<\/p>\n\n\n\n (4)Subsection (3)(a) applies in relation to Northern Ireland as if the reference to 12 months were a reference to 6 months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ch.2 THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Ch.3 THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Ch.4 THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES<\/a><\/strong>\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n EXAMPLES OF HOW THE CORRUPT AUTHORITIES & the company they keep \u2013 AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Ch. 2 EXAMPLES OF HOW CORRUPT AUTHORITIES & the company they keep \u2013 AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Every time they remove\/ alter their original claims or remove links etc from my website, which I stated from the beginning; is to be used as evidence for my defense in any upcoming court hearing I may have, they are interfering with\/perverting the course of justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “There is a significant amount of overlap between attempting to pervert the course of justice on one hand, and attempting to defeat the ends of justice on the other. <\/a><\/strong>They are wide-ranging offences, but can be defined as follows (from\u00a0Hanley v HMA [2018 HCJAC 29]<\/a><\/em>) by Crime.Scot<\/a> A work-in-progress guide to Scottish criminal law \u201c[T]he essence of the charge is the interference with what would otherwise be expected to have come to pass in the ordinary and uninterrupted course of justice in the particular case.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n *Guidance for social housing providers | Equality and Human Rights Commission (equalityhumanrights.com)<\/a> <\/strong> they have removed *this [‘friends of govt’ alter things after the fact to prevent themselves from being held accountable<\/a><\/strong>] – despite they falsely claim to be independent. How they must all laugh; every time they use the word independent – just like the rest of the frauds who are operating under false pretences<\/a>! <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n *Article 8: Right to respect for private life, family life and the home<\/p>\n\n\n\n The response of social housing providers to incidents of anti-social behaviour is more likely to engage with the human rights of victims than with those of perpetrators<\/em>. While there is no human right to expect a social housing provider to keep a resident safe and free from nuisance at all times, a failure to address or tackle the reported experience of anti-social behaviour may well amount to a failure to respect the private or family life of a victim or an infringement of his or her right to respect for the home.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Rent (Scotland) Act 1984 (legislation.gov.uk)<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n 2) If any person with intent to cause the residential occupier of any premises\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n (a)to give up the occupation of the premises or any part thereof; or<\/p>\n\n\n\n (b)to refrain from exercising any right or pursuing any remedy in respect of the premises or part thereof; does acts calculated to interfere with the peace or comfort of the residential occupier or members of his household, or persistently withdraws or withholds services reasonably required for the occupation of the premises as a residence, he shall be guilty of an offence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The basis of my complaint to CHA was this: CHA\u2019s housing officer Susan Stewart forced a 75-yr. old gentleman to remove his CCTV with a threat<\/strong> of \u201csee you in court\u201d if he did not comply.\u00a0 He had been advised to install it by the police and Citizens Advice Bureau, to protect himself and gather evidence against an anti-social tenant (a.s.t.). Along with her guest,\u00a0they\u00a0committed multiple accounts of harassment, violations of privacy, defamed his character on social networking, and damaged his property. CHA said the CCTV \u201cviolated her rights\u201d\u00a0<\/em>and CHA implied to the victim, that they had more authority than the police. The real reason they ordered removal is because \u2018no evidence means no case<\/strong>\u2019\u00a0<\/em>against the a.s.t or CHA, who behave like an anti -social landlord.\u00a0The a.s.t.\u2019s guest had issued the gentleman with a credible death threat,\u00a0but CHA did not want anything recorded so instead they deliberately put a vulnerable man, in harm\u2019s way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Culpable and Reckless Conduct \u2013 Crime.Scot<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cCulpable and reckless conduct is deliberate conduct that exposes an individual, or the public generally, to significant risk to life or health.\u201d by Andrew Crosbie and Advocate at the Scottish Bar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It did not occur to me at the time, but another reason why CHA wanted the CCTV removed, is because it would have caught evidence against the other anti-social tenants; whose \u2018customers\u2019 in cars would have had to drive past the CCTV, to get back out of the scheme and \u2018No evidence means no case<\/strong>!<\/em> \u2018 The housing officer Susan Stewart turned up the next day with contractors to forcibly remove the CCTV, but the victim had removed them during the night. CHA did not care about his well-being. CHA has some of society\u2019s most vulnerable people on their books, yet they are maliciously causing people unnecessary distress, which impacts on existing health issues; a fact they are fully aware of. Quite simply this lack of empathy and concern for service users is at the very least, tantamount to neglect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The police said they have never known any other housing association do this (force removal of CCTV).\u00a0Neither has anyone else I have run this by! CHA does not like evidence being obtained and even when tenants show them any,\u00a0they deny its existence.\u00a0The CHA mantra\u00a0\u2018no evidence means no case\u2019<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0is because\u00a0they cannot risk anyone looking closely into their affairs, which is the very reason they need to be investigated;\u00a0CHA has a lot to hide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The gentleman asked the company\u2019s Chief Executive Officer Julie Cosgrove for help three times, but she ignored him and instead CHA got even nastier. Chief bully boy (previously, the Operations Director) Tim Calderbank, paid him a visit three times and nit-picked over everything in this man\u2019s immaculate home and garden area and harassed him, trying to make out he was the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cHave you got permission for this or that? I might have to report this\u2026 Do you realise it is costing a lot of money for me to have to come to see you? You stay away from her next door and have nothing to do with the garden area\u2026 and why don\u2019t you move out, there are plenty of people who would like your house\u2026. you will never get the CCTV back up\u2026. etc\u201d, on and on until Tim ground the poor man down making sure he wouldn\u2019t formally complain. They placed enormous pressure upon this gentleman and protected the a.s.t. It\u2019s disgusting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After CHA empowered the anti -social tenant, she and her guest started damaging his car. He reported it to the police and made the mistake of reporting it to Director Tim Calderbank. Tim told the gentleman he was having a word with the police and after this, despite a prearranged appointment the police did not show up. As usual CHA never visited the a.s.t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n From that point in time, whenever the victim needed the police to deal with his a.s.t. next door, they never turned up or were unsympathetic and just like Tim Calderbank, they tried to make out the victim was the problem. I guess Tim planted this idea into their heads. CHA has a history of manipulating people, so they can control the situation. They do not like anyone, helping those they choose to harass, and they regularly defame people\u2019s character, behind their backs or perhaps they told the police they were dealing with it. CHA deprived this vulnerable man of vital police support, which he is entitled to receive in law and by putting obstacles in the good tenant\u2019s way, it also reduces the risk of any evidence being recorded by the police and therefore again \u2018no evidence means no case\u2019<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The a.s.t. violated his privacy most days; forcing him to keep his curtains shut as she stood right outside his windows, often with another person, staring at him for long periods, verbally abusing him and his guests, and continued causing criminal damage to his plants and property. Later more credible death threats were issued to the gentleman. Business Service Director Garry Savage (and staff) trivialise all tenants\u2019 complaints, and when writing my reports, he described them all as minor wider estate issues, to deceive anyone the tenants complain to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whenever the gentleman complained to housing officer Cheryl Connelly about what he is having to put up with on almost a daily basis, she (sarcastically) asks \u201chave you any evidence?\u201d He points out how they forced him to remove CCTV and she replies with the usual response \u201cwell as there is no evidence, we can\u2019t do anything about it\u201d. When he showed Cheryl some evidence on his phone she said, \u201cI can\u2019t comment on that!\u201d But CHA doesn\u2019t need evidence when they act upon vexatious complaints made by this a.s.t. to harass decent tenants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The police always respond to the a.s.t. because she is as manipulative as CHA. Along with CHA, she gets away with regularly ruining the peaceful enjoyment of this gentleman\u2019s home and his property. She also has a paper trail with SSPCA, council, councillors etc and is known by the police in two other areas. These personality types (just like the sick, twisted people at CHA) do not have friends\u2026. they just have people who they can use. This a.s.t. and her guest are happy to cause trouble and CHA is happy to oblige them; feeding off each other, to bring misery to tenants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another tenant had witnessed the first death threat to the gentleman and reported it to the police. This evidence was ignored by CHA, they then went on to harass the witness; with the same a.s.t., who made a vexatious complaint, ordering them to remove something from their garden area which had been in the ground for over 15 years!<\/p>\n\n\n\n When\u00a0another set of neighbours dared to complain to CHA, about problems with a different anti- social neighbours,\u00a0CHA gave them the run-around too by falsely claiming there was no evidence. The tenants reported CHA to the\u00a0Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO),\u00a0they said they thought this was their report when I asked them.\u00a0Decision Report 201503760 | SPSO<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n CHA misled the (SPSO) by engaging in deliberate acts of deception to prevent evidence being revealed, about other a.s.t.\u2019s. and their own maladministration. This included bullying representatives of a voluntary organisation, who gave independent advice to the \u2018victims.\u2019 CHA defamed and humiliated those making the complaint, implying they were liars and troublemakers, to the SPSO. CHA refused to acknowledge the evidence, the victims had spent months collecting and had sent to the landlord. CHA deliberately put a noise recording machine in the wrong house and as far away as possible from the a.s.t.\u2019s twilight activities, to say there was no noise detected. It looks good on paper though and told the SPSO; \u201cwe have done all we can to find evidence but there is none!\u201d and \u2018no evidence means no case\u2019<\/strong>. CHA are pathological liars!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Obviously the SPSO went against the tenants who brought the complaint because she based her opinions on the evidence which CHA made available, which was only their twisted perspective of the truth. CHA makes sure this is all what authorities receive. However, when I later sent my website to the SPSO, the rest of the regulators and the government, they ignored all the evidence shown to them see Ch.\u2019s 6,7 &8. It strongly indicated they have been allowing CHA to operate above the law for years. There is a paper trail on the a.s.t. with the police (and court) and if this is compared to CHA\u2019s twisted version, (and what they sent to the SPSO, unless they too are willing to falsify this evidence, to protect their buddies), it would reveal the truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n CHA tried to get the tenants who raised the complaint, to move out to resolve the issues, when they declined, CHA then told them their complaint was resolved and not to bother them again. CHA obviously meant resolved to their satisfaction and that of the anti-social tenants, who were allowed to continue conducting \u2018business as normal\u2019, protected by their \u2018guard dogs\u2019 and CHA. I told Garry Savage he should not be driving good tenants out, so he responded by driving us out!<\/p>\n\n\n\n A.s.t.\u2019s everywhere must think they have an amazing landlord who is willing to lie, harass and\/or drive out decent tenants and falsify evidence to protect their unlawful interests! They must think they have died and gone to heaven. No wonder Scotland has the worst record in Europe, for drug related deaths!\u00a0Scotland\u2019s drug death crisis in six charts \u2013 BBC News<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Other areas have tenants who said CHA did nothing about the a.s.t.\u2019s and have turned their area into a drug haven, allowed homes to be used as brothels and have had burglaries, but CHA deflected, saying it is the police\u2019s job to deal with it. The police did not cause the problem as it was CHA who chose to put a.s.t\u2019s in their homes, refuse to deal with them and then make sure nobody obtains any evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tenants should put up CCTV to protect themselves which will also act as a deterrent and to get evidence to prove CHA are dishonest. Don\u2019t bother with the CHA complaint procedure, they commit fraud and rewrite the facts sanctioned by regulators as seen throughout website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Guidance on the use of domestic CCTV \u2013 GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Updated 05.06.23<\/strong> I wrongly believed until the video below surfaced, that CHA had coerced an MSP from helping any of the above tenants. Garry Savage lied in my complaint response (ch.6), stating we had cancelled a meeting with the MSP, which Tim Calderbank was supposed to attend with a group of tenants. He did not turn up as his outcome was achieved before we got there; to make sure the MSP would not help any of the tenants. So again, no paper trail and \u2018no evidence means no case<\/strong>\u2019.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n I now believe this SNP who is currently a Cabinet Secretary for Rural affairs, Mairi Gougeo<\/strong>n (nee Evans) was complicit with helping CHA avoid accountability. She has been promoted several times since then, probably for being a good little sycophant. Another name to add to the SNP hall of shame and corruption.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Ring-Fenced And Missing! – YouTube<\/strong><\/a> by Silver Fox Takes<\/strong> MSP Mairi Gougeon claims<\/strong> she has no idea where \u00a333M has gone! <\/p>\n\n\n\n SNP in new missing money furore as minister can’t say where \u00a333m of ring-fenced cash went – Scottish Daily Express<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n At the time of the tenants complaints, the MSP told us that CHA had claimed<\/strong> the a.s.t.\u2019s had lawyered up to stop CHA harassing them, but the real reason they had lawyers was because they are known to the police. Same lame excuse for both anti-social tenants. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Rent (Scotland) Act 1984 (legislation.gov.uk)<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Not only does CHA break the law itself, but anyone it uses to harass the tenants are also breaking the law including the vexatious anti-social tenant and contractors. Yet Sheriff Jillian Martin Brown (Ch.2) was not interested in hearing any of this, she only had ears for CHA and their lying, solicitor. I wonder what she gained from this arrangement!<\/p>\n\n\n\n CHA then victimised my son and me for assisting the gentleman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I told housing officer Cheryl Connelly she should be dealing with the vexatious anti-social tenant and not victimising the gentleman, by getting him to jump to her attention. CHA\u2019s response was to try to get me to respond to a vexatious complaint generated by her (correspondence in ch.6). I had tried to defend this gentleman as any decent human being would do, but because CHA will not allow anyone to assist those they choose to victimise, they turned on me. You tell CHA they should not be doing something, and they respond by doing it again. CHA\u2019s stance is that nobody is going to stop them from doing whatever they like, to whoever they like, because the narcissists egos believe they are entitled and due to their enablers sanctioning their behaviour. They too are then complicit and therefore culpable for the harm they cause and the laws they have broken.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Without any evidence, CHA, and their favourite anti-social tenant, claimed sun in October, was reflecting from the roof of my garden structure and disturbing the peaceful enjoyment of her home. I was expected to respond to her vexatious complaint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/donottrustthem.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-15-1024x454.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"DATA](\"https:\/\/donottrustthem.com\/images\/DATA-BREACH-OF-A.S.T.-750x352.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
![\"Picture1\"](\"https:\/\/donottrustthem.com\/images\/Picture1-750x568.png\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/donottrustthem.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-14-1024x468.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n