The Nuremberg Code (1947)

UPDATED 19/09/23 There are many twisted, evil people engaging in crimes against humanity, who are ignoring all ethical codes and laws but use legislation and influence to attack us. They made themselves JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER. The perpetrators even rub our noses in the fact they are: OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES with many EXAMPLES OF HOW THE CORRUPT AUTHORITIES & the company they keep – AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY.

💪💪💪 The authors who have spoken up about this, [Nuremberg Code & request for a trial] ⬇⬇⬇ would benefit from the public sharing (& copying all of this on every platform to create awareness; for future reference) and to save lives and prevent more unnecessary harm.

The perpetrators of these Crimes Against Humanity – need to be STOPPED, REMOVED and DETAINED NOW – where they can no longer commit atrocities against innocent people. Those who support them are all complicit and equally culpable – by enabling them.

https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
7 December 1996.
“Introduction; The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to
which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in
a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post
World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document
enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The
principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control
his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected
benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended
into general codes of medical ethics.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical
experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds,
conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the
practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such
experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other
methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must
be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.”

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved
as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This
latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision
by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature,
duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is
to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected;
and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests
upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is
a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with
impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of
society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random
and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal
experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other
problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the
experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical
and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to
believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those
experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the
humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to
protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury,
disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.
The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of
the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to
bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state
where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared
to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe,
in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required
of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury,
disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

Please, also see THE WHO PANDEMIC TREATY to force unnecessary experiments and health treatments on the world population.

The state racketeers sacked a decent human being, Kaira McCallum (a magistrate)- who wanted to bring a case against the corrupt UK govt; who then encouraged MSM/trolls etc., to smear her: Magistrate removed after bringing Nuremberg Code case against UK government – YouTube and more information: Holocaust Survivors’ Letter to the International Criminal Court – Doctors for COVID Ethics (doctors4covidethics.org :

In April 2021, Attorney Melinda C. Mayne and Kaira S. McCallum submitted a “Request for Investigation” to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The two lawyers accused the UK government of genocide, crimes against humanity, and breaches of the Nuremberg Code. Lawyers from Slovakia, France, and the Czech Republic have since joined them. In particular, they charged that

“the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are deliberately engineered bioweapons that have been released in two phases on unsuspecting peoples of the world”.

The holocaust survivors Vera Sharav, Moshe Brown, and Hillel Handler have sent a letter to the ICC to support the joint claim. In the letter, they expressed their concerns over the Covid-19 vaccines, calling for an immediate stop to

“this ungodly and criminal medical experiment on humankind.”

Please follow the link to the news report on the joint claim and the Holocaust survivors’ letter.

Holocaust survivors join Lawyers, Dr. Fleming, and Prof Luc Montagnier in demanding the International Criminal Court charge World Governments with Crimes against Humanity, Genocide, and breaches of the Nuremberg Code

“We For Humanity We are an international association of lawyers, doctors, scientists, journalists as well as representatives of other professions. We represent interests of all people in the world who aspire to live in freedom, self determination, dignity and truthfulness.
We For Humanity, trust-in-humanity@pm.me

The International Criminal Court
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519
2500CM The Hague
The Netherlands
E-mail: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
September 20, 2021
Letter in support of the joint ‘Request for Investigation’ to the ICC from the UK,
Slovakia, France and the Czech Republic

Dear Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Mr Karim Khan,
We the undersigned, as Nazi Concentration Camp survivors of the atrocities committed
against humanity during the Second World War, feel bound to follow our conscience and write
this letter in support of the joint ‘Request for Investigation’ to the International Criminal Court
submitted on behalf of the United Kingdom (143.21), Slovakia (133.21), France (271/21) and
the Czech Republic (326/21) on the 12th of August 2021. The contents of the ´Request´ include
sworn affidavits from expert witnesses Dr. Richard Fleming, Professor Luc Montagnier and Dr.
Kevin McCairn.

It is obvious to us that another horrific series of events, this time affecting all people around
the world, is taking place before our eyes. However, the majority of the world’s populace do
not yet realise what is happening, for the magnitude of an organized crime such as this is
beyond their scope of experience. We, however, know. We remember the name Josef
Mengele. Some of us have personal memories. We experience a déjà vu that is so horrifying
that we rise to shield our poor fellow humans. The threatened innocents now include children,
and even infants.

In just four months, the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ have killed more people than all available vaccines
combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years. And people between
18 and 64 years old who were barely at risk from COVID-19 and consequently barely showed
up in mortality statistics on or with COVID-19, account for up to 80% of records as victims of
‘vaccination’. The EudraVigilance database reports that through September 18, 2021 there are
14,863 deaths and 3,691,366 injuries reported following injections of four experimental
COVID-19 so-called vaccines. As of the real numbers the famous Lazarus report from Harvard
Pilgrim Health Care inc. in 2009 revealed that in general only 1% of adverse events from
vaccines is ever being reported:

“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of
ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug
events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. ”
We call upon you to help stop this ungodly and criminal medical experiment on humankind
immediately.

What is called ‘vaccination’ against the SARS-Cov-2 virus is in truth a blasphemy encroachment
into nature. Never before has immunization of the entire planet been accomplished by
delivering a synthetic mRNA into the human body. It is a medical experiment to which the
Nuremberg Code must be applied. The 10 ethical principles in this document represents a
foundational code of medical ethics that was formulated during the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trials
to ensure that human beings would never again be subjected to involuntary medical
experimentation and procedures, but yet this is exactly what is happening around the world
now.

We remind you of the following. Principle 1 of the Nuremberg Codex:
(a) “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the
person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able
to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud,
deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have
sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to
enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. (b) This latter element
requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject
there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the
method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably
to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
(c) The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each
individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and
responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. ”
Re. (a): There is no question of a free decision. Governments and mass media spread fear and
panic and use the rule of Goebbels’ propaganda by repeating untruths until they are believed.
For weeks now they have been calling for the ostracism of the unvaccinated. If 80 years ago
it was the Jews who were demonised as spreaders of infectious diseases, today it is the
unvaccinated who are being accused of spreading the virus. Physical integrity, freedom to
travel, freedom to work, all coexistence has been taken away from people in order to force
‘vaccination ‘ upon them. Children are being enticed to get vaccinated against their parents’
judgement.

Re (b): The 22 terrible side effects already listed in the FDA emergency-use authorization were
not disclosed to the subjects of the experimental trial. They are as follows :

Guillain-Barré syndrome
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Transverse myelitis
Encephalitis/encephalomyelitis/me ningoencephalitis/meningitis/encepholapathy
Convulsions/seizures
Stroke
Narcolepsy and cataplexy
Anaphylaxis
Acute myocardial infraction
Myocarditis/pericarditis
Autoimmune disease
Deaths
Pregnancy and birth outcomes
Other acute demyelinating diseases
Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
Thrombocytopenia
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Venous thromboembolism
Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
Kawasaki disease
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in CHILDREN
Vaccine enhanced disease.
By definition, there has never been informed consent. In the meantime, thousands of sideeffects recorded in numerous databases are on record. While the so-called case numbers are
being bleeped in 30-min-intervals by all mass media, there is neither any mentioning of the
serious adverse side effects nor how and where the side-effects are to be reported. As far as
we know, even recorded deaths and adverse events have been deleted on a large scale on
some databases.”