The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse – Edmund Burke

CHOOSE LIFE NOT SERVITUDE: New Page created: 05/09/25 The despots in the UK govt & their equally treacherous enablers, intend to force upon its citizens; ID MANDATES. Using their popular, lame excuse of pretending to deal with illegal immigration – while in reality, it is just another attempt to deflect from their sinister agenda: TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF OUR LIVES: TOTALITARIANISM. You will not be able to do anything without their permission and will have no way of protecting yourselves or your family or the rest of civilised society. You will be completely ‘at their mercy.’ The public must not allow them to get away with this. Please for all our sakes – shout out publicly: NO! do not give them the information they require. Inform them; they have already proven they cannot be trusted with anything, so why would you cooperate with them to be betrayed again❓ They are delusional control freaks – consumed by greed – so do not allow them to entrap you again.

DATA PROTECTION ABUSE

Page updated 10/09/25 Over decades, whilst pretending to work in our interests, the authorities have made use of the personal/sensitive data they accumulated and have been using it against individuals. Now, they’re using it against us – en masse. They have also corrupted everything from the top down. You can stop this by refusing to share anything on the grounds they cannot be trusted and give many examples. The UK governments & their enablers including regulators, law firms, big companies/organisations etc have been operating under false pretences, and their collusion strongly indicates Serious Organised Crime – as they are using all the resources available to them – entirely for personal gain.

CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME

Ch.2 CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/serious-and-organised-crime-strategy

“We define serious and organised crime as individuals planning, co-ordinating and committing serious offences, whether individually, in groups and/or as part of transnational networks.” From: Home Office — See all updates

EXAMPLE: THE GOVERNMENT/PARLIAMENT IS THE MOST LUCRATIVE EMPLOYER FOR UNSCRUPULOUS PERSONS  – WITH  HISTORICAL EVIDENCE, ITS MEMBERS HAVE USED INFLUENCE AND FAVOURS TO AMASS GREAT WEALTH & POWER FOR THEMSELVES & THE COMPANY THEY KEEP, & TO AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY. They operate to the detriment of the public. = THE EPITOME OF SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME.

THE CHECKS AND BALANCES, THE BANKS,  & HMRC ARE ENBLING THEM BY LOOKING THE OTHER WAY, MAKING THEM COMPLICIT & CULPABLE.

MONEY FOR FAVOURS – ENABLES CORRUPT INDIVIDUALS/ COMPANIES/ORGANISATIONS TO EXPLOIT OTHERS.

Pin by Belinda Watson on Social Conscience | Funny, Misogyny, Pig

Fresh Boris Johnson scandal emerges over alleged profiting while in office

Helen Corbett  https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/boris-johnson-profiting-contacts-prime-minister-allowance-b2822707.html

Tuesday 09 September 2025 00:28 BST

• Calls have been made for Boris Johnson to be stripped of his access to an allowance for former prime ministers amid allegations he profited from contacts made while in office [IT IS THE ONLY REASON THESE PEOPLE PURSUE POSITIONS OF POWER -TAKE ALL AND GIVE NOTHING BACK BUT MISERY TO THE PUBLIC. ]
• The allegations are based on leaked data provided by the non-profit Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoS) and published by The Guardian.
• Specific claims include Mr Johnson lobbying a senior Saudi official he met in office and receiving over £200,000 after meeting Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro.
• Questions have also been raised about whether his company, the Office of Boris Johnson, blurred the lines regarding the use of his ex-prime minister’s allowance for private or commercial activities. [STARTING THEIR OWN COMPANY – IS ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE IN MONEY LAUNDERING]
• Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokesperson Sarah Olney MP has urged the Government to suspend Mr Johnson’s Public Duty Costs Allowance, which provides up to £115,000 annually for public duties, pending a full investigation.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-duty-cost-allowance/public-duty-costs-allowance-guidance

The political elite [self-titled] are in reality: ‘neither use nor ornament’. – just parasites.

SACK HIM, REMOVE ALL HIS ASSETS AND HIS PENSION. DELVE INTO HIS OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS TOO. PUT HIM IN PRISON FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE, and for misleading the public over covid etc.

 “Misconduct in public office (“MiPO”) is a common law offence that can be tried only on indictment. It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The offence concerns serious wilful abuse or neglect of the power or responsibilities of the public office held. There must be a direct link between the misconduct and an abuse of those powers or responsibilities” … and there is so much evidence! 

A public officer 

There is no simple definition of a public officer, and each case must be assessed individually, taking into account the nature of the role, the duties carried out and the level of public trust involved. 

In Mitchell [2014] EWCA Crim 318, the Court of Appeal had to decide whether an ambulance paramedic was a public officer. Lord Justice Leveson stated that the correct approach was to ask three questions: 

“First, what was the position held? Second, what is the nature of the duties undertaken by the employee or officer in that position? Third, does the fulfilment of those duties represent the fulfilment of one of the responsibilities of government such that the public have a significant interest in the discharge of the duty which is additional to or beyond an interest in anyone who might be directly affected by a serious failure in the performance of that duty? If the answer to this last question is “yes”, the relevant employee or officer is acting as a public officer; if “no”, he or she is not acting as a public officer.” 

Applying those questions to the paramedic, the Court held that they were not a public officer.

Remuneration is a significant factor, but not determinative (Belton [2010] EWCA Crim 2857).

The following have been held to be public officers: 

• holders of judicial and quasi-judicial office (judges, magistrates, registrars, coroners)
• police constables (including while suspended from duty – see Knox [2011] EWHC 1629 (Admin)
• police community support officers (Amar Iqbal [2008] EWCA Crim 2066) and other police civilian employees (L [2011] EWCA Crim 1259 ; Gallagher [2010] EWCA Crim 3201)
• immigration officers (John-Ayo [2008] EWCA Crim 1651)
• elected officials (MPs, councillors, ministers, mayors)
• civil servants (including local authority officers and DVLA employees)
• prison staff (including prison nurses and those employed by private companies operating prisons)
• army officers
• Bishops of the Church of England (Ball [2015] Unreported)
• volunteer members of the Independent Monitoring Board (Belton [2010] EWCA Crim 2857)

Acting as such

“Acting as such” needs to be distinguished from circumstances in which the suspect was merely “acting whilst” a public officer. There must be a close nexus between the wilful neglect/breach of duty or wilful misconduct and the power, authority, responsibilities and/or duties vested in the suspect by virtue of their office.

In R (on the application of Johnson) v Westminster Magistrates Court [2019] EWHC 1709 (Admin) the court held:

“The words “acting as such” plainly mean acting in the discharge of the duties of the office…

Dishonesty

Where the alleged misconduct involves dishonesty, the dishonesty must be proved as the mens rea for the MiPO offence: W (M) [2010] EWCA Crim 372. [THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN VOTED IN – IF THE PUBLIC HAD KNOWN THEIR INTENTIONS AND AGENDAS.]

Seriousness of the neglect or misconduct 

Not every wilful neglect of duty or misconduct will suffice to constitute the offence. There is a high bar of seriousness. In Attorney General’s Reference No 3 of 2003 [2004] EWCA Crim 868 the court said that the misconduct must amount to:

“… an affront to the standing of the public office held. The threshold is a high one requiring conduct so far below acceptable standards as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder.” 

Whether the threshold is met in a particular case is a matter for the jury.

In determining whether conduct is serious enough to amount to MiPO in any given case, prosecutors must consider whether the conduct injured the public interest or abused public trust to such a degree as to warrant criminal punishment: Dytham (1979) QB 722. Whether the public interest has been harmed by the conduct is an objective question. If the answer is no, then the offence will not made out: Chapman [2015] EWCA Crim 539.

Mere negligence or even a serious mistake will not suffice: Attorney General’s Reference No 3 of 2003 [2004] EWCA Crim 868. 

Factors that may be relevant to seriousness

It is difficult to extract from the case law definitive guidance on when conduct will reach the necessary threshold for misconduct in public office. Each case will be fact and context specific. Some broad themes can, however, be identified that prosecutors may find helpful to consider when assessing the level of seriousness in a particular case:

• Did the conduct involve the exploitation or attempted exploitation of vulnerable people? (see for example Amar Iqbal [2008] EWCA Crim 2066). [WHILST THEY SPEND ALL THEIR TIME LOOKING FOR MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO MAKE EASY MONEY, THEY HAVE SERIOUSLY NEGLECTED THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO THE PUBLIC AND ARE EVEN REWRITING THEIR ROLES…see ‘THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES’ ]
• Did the conduct have an operational impact that harmed the public interest or undermined public trust either in the role held by the suspect or the relevant public service or institution? (Norman [2016] EWCA Crim 1564; Collins & Ors [2022] EWCA Crim 742). This might include conduct where the objectivity of the suspect in the exercise of their powers and authority was compromised or that exposed them to conflicts of interest or exploitation (whether or not any actual harm was caused): Cosford [2013] EWCA Crim 466.
• What was the suspect’s motive? Was it personal gain (either financial or otherwise)? At its highest the motive may be malice or bad faith, but they are not prerequisites. [YES]
• What was the severity of the actual or likely consequences? Was there a risk of death or serious injury? [* OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROFITEERING ATTRACTS UNSCRUPULOUS PERSONS TO POSITIONS OF TRUST, THE PUBLIC ARE HARMED BY THE DIRECT/& INDIRECT DECISIONS THEY MAKE]
• How egregious was the abuse of power? [HUGE] Did the wilful misconduct or breach of a duty have the effect of benefitting the wider public interest rather than being injurious to it (see Chapman [2015] EWCA Crim 539). [* THESE EXPLOITIVE PERSONALITY TYPES ARE GIVEN JOBS WHICH ENABLES THEM TO ACCUMULATE GREAT WEALTH FOR THEMSELVES / AND OR GUARANTEES FUTURE EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS FOR THOSE INVOLVED IN THE CORRUPTION. THEY ENGAGE IN ‘DIRTY’ ACTIONS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES – e.g. BY HARMING/SILENCING WHISTLEBLOWERS, & VICTIMS – & BY USING MANDATES, POLICIES, LEGISLATION, AS A WEAPON – all funded by the taxpayer.]

This vs. That – What’s the Difference?

“Mandate and policy are both terms used in the context of decision-making and governance, but they have distinct meanings. A mandate is a formal order or authorization given to someone to carry out a specific task or responsibility. It is typically given by a higher authority and outlines the scope and limitations of the individual’s power. On the other hand, a policy is a set of guidelines or principles that govern decision-making and behavior within an organization or government. Policies are often developed to achieve specific goals or objectives and provide a framework for consistent and fair decision-making.” (🤣Please someone, throw a dictionary at them – figuratively speaking of course. They do not even know the difference between right or wrong, good or evil, truth or lies…) “While a mandate gives authority to act, a policy provides direction on how to act!”

When the Regulator Looks Away: A Blind Client’s Ordeal Through Legal Misconduct and Institutional Evasion – by John Barwell

“Ms C’s story is not just about one client. It is about whether regulators serve the public, or the profession.” – John Barwell https://legallens.org.uk/about/

When the Regulator Looks Away: A Blind Client’s Ordeal Through Legal Misconduct and Institutional Evasion

By making everything digital, and removing face to face customer service & retail outlets, banks etc, denying the public access to our own finances and more (& also creating higher unemployment), whilst removing any chance of redress or financial autonomy for the multi millions/billions – members of the public – who will suffer at their hands. Many will be slaughtered/ or commit suicide, because of all those in cahoots – who have no respect for humanity. TORTURE & MURDER BY STEALTH TACTICS.

‘What is Social Murder?‘

“Social murder is the ‘stealthy’ normalisation of social injustice, poverty, deprivation, mums going without to feed their littles ones, local councils too strapped for cash to provide school meals for hungry children, working families who work long hours and are still unable to keep up with the rent, council tax, heating bills.” – By Clifford Thurlow https://cliffordthurlow.com/2022/11/10/what-is-social-murder/

“When one individual inflicts bodily injury upon another such that death results, we call the deed manslaughter; when the assailant knew in advance that the injury would be fatal, we call his deed murder. But when society places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death, one which is quite as much a death by violence as that by the sword or bullet; when it deprives thousands of the necessaries of life, places them under conditions in which they cannot live – forces them, through the strong arm of the law, to remain in such conditions until that death ensues which is the inevitable consequence – knows that these thousands of victims must perish, and yet permits these conditions to remain, its deed is murder just as surely as the deed of the single individual; disguised, malicious murder, murder against which none can defend himself, which does not seem what it is, because no man sees the murderer, because the death of the victim seems a natural one, since the offence is more one of omission than of commission. But murder it remains.” – Friedrich Engels -The Conditions of the Working class in England

Did Labour MP Just Admit The Truth About Digital ID? Reaction video by Gareth Icke  👀👀❤exposing the ulterior motives behind the facade of Digital ID; whilst the despots & co claim it is necessary for ‘the greater good!’ Lying frauds!

Robert Peston is just another sycophant, spoon feeding the public what they want us to believe is true. Remember, they already sold/ or gave our sensitive medical details details to another snake; Mark Zuckerberg, without our permission. We have no idea where our data goes and none of them are held to account when it is abused.

None of the political parties can be trusted, the scandals surrounding them are exposed every day. Yet, some are still under the delusion there ever was a democracy and continue to vote to keep the state criminals in very lucrative jobs – so they can abuse us all some more!🙄 They do not seem to understand they are paying for their own downfall.

KNOW THY ENEMY.

▶▶▶ 12 Common Manipulation Techniques Used by Narcissistic Politicians by WEBSITE OUR MENTAL HEALTH ◀◀◀

“Understanding Their Tactics: 1) Gaslighting 2) Projection 3) Triangulation 4) Love Bombing 5) Blame Shifting 6) Silent Treatment 7) Flying Monkeys 8) Victim Playing 9) Charm Offensive 10) False Promises 11) Isolating Critics 12) Double Standards. These tactics are common in personal/workplace relationships too and they also believe themselves to be above the law!”

THE PREDATORY BEHAVIOUR of the self-titled ‘elite’

In essence, the Machiavellians, narcissists, and psychopaths [Dark Triad traits] who are already exploiting all the resources available to them, are hell bent on completely destroying the UK and our lives.

The Danger of Dark Triad Leaders Steve Taylor Ph.D. “The link between psychological disorders and power.”.

“The political actions of dark triad leaders are simply an extension of their personality traits. For example, one of the traits of dark triad leaders is a constant desire to accumulate. They seem to feel a deep sense of inner lack which drives them to constantly try to collect more power, wealth, fame and success. This is what drives them to become leaders in the first place, and once they become leaders, they project this impulse onto their nations.” 

“The government quickly becomes what the Polish psychologist Andrew Lobaczewski referred to as a “pathocracy” — a government made of individuals with personality disorders.”

HUMAN RIGHTS ARE BEING ABUSED/ERODED BY THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS.

Reasons we should never give up our human rights.

DIGITAL ID TRAP: Why You Should Be Worried About Government Overreach – Bev Turner – GB News “Bev Turner gets the facts on the BritCard: Is it a tool for streamlining services, or a step towards a UK surveillance state? ”

“We break down how this digital ID could link your finances, health, and daily movements and why critics warn it threatens your freedom. The BritCard is not about making your life easier. It’s about making you EASIER TO TRACK, CONTROL, and PUNISH if you step out of line, across whatever line of the day is deemed important…”

09/09/25 Bev is right, the public needs to keep focused on what really matters and not be sidetracked by the many distractions and sensational stories spewing out from the propaganda machines, some to cause outrage, fear, alarm and or distress. All of it is orchestrated; by those who are sitting back and enjoying the chaos they cause. The lunatics are working at ‘full throttle’. Keep on exposing them for what they are, and laugh at how desperate they have become. Every time they attack us – they just demonstrate how they have completely lost the plot and give us even more evidence & reasons to justify their removal.