“The delusion of the day is to enrich all the classes at the expense of each other, it is to generate plunder under the pretence of organising it.”
“The Fatal Idea of Legal Plunder; But if the fatal principle should come to be introduced, that, under pretence of organization, regulation, protection, or encouragement, the law, may take from one party in order to give to another, help itself to the wealth, acquired by all the classes, that it may increase that of one class…”
“When a portion of wealth passes out of the hands of him who acquired it without his consent, and without compensation, to him who has not created it, whether by force or by artifice, I say that property is violated, that plunder is perpetrated.”
“…see whether the law performs for the profit of one citizen, and, to the injury of others, an act which this citizen cannot perform without committing a crime, Abolish this law without delay;it is not merely an iniquity – it is a fertile source of iniquities, for it invites reprisals; if you do not take care, the exceptional case will extend, multiply, and become systematic.”
“Thus as the force of an individual cannot lawfully touch the person, the person, the liberty, or the property of another individual – for the same reason, the common force cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, the liberty, or the property of individuals or of classes.”
“Universal plunder – We have been threatened by this system when the elective privilege has become universal; the masses have conceived the idea of making law, on the principle of legislators who had proceeded them.”
[All the above quotations are from the Book: The Law by FrédéricBastiat; originally published in French in 1980, later published in English as part of Essays in Political Economy from the translation by Patrick James Sterling.]
“You may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not know.” – William Wilberforce
18/01/26 I would highly recommend everyone look into this website; NO TAX FOR WAR The more tax money WE divert into a trust, means less money they have to fund *Genocide, unethical contracts, ideological agendas, embezzlement and other crimes, which are orchestrated by our untrustworthy govts. I intend to go down this route.
“How do you pay tax?
You might be an employee, self-employed, retired, a business owner, or an employer — or any combination of those! Or you might have income from a pension, inheritance, or property. If you’re paying tax, there’s a way to withhold it lawfully.”
“Why this matters.
You’re not refusing to pay tax. You’re ring-fencing it, until the UK government can prove it is acting within international law.
By setting up a trust, you’re refusing to be complicit.
You’re not breaking the law — you’re using it.
You’re not hiding your money — you’re holding power to account.
You’re not evading tax — you’re demanding justice.”
“Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.“
The UK have also conducted social experiments against the Nuremberg Code (1947): [“laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.“] by forcing vaccines upon its citizens using threatening (coercive) tactics.
“The intimidation of a victim to compel the individual: to do some act against his or her will by the use of psychological pressure, physical force, or threats”
The UK state; has actively engaged in many dangerous, illegal actions; including acts of Terrorism, Genocide and Warmongering – forced upon its own people and globally.
UNITED NATIONS: Definitions of Genocide and Related Crimes: “Genocide was first recognised as a crime under international law in 1946 by the United Nations General Assembly (A/RES/96-I). It was codified as an independent crime in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Genocide Convention). The Convention has been ratified by 153 States (as of April 2022). The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has repeatedly stated that the Convention embodies principles that are part of general customary international law. This means that whether or not States have ratified the Genocide Convention, they are all bound as a matter of law by the principle that genocide is a crime prohibited under international law. The ICJ has also stated that the prohibition of genocide is a peremptory norm of international law (or ius cogens) and consequently, no derogation from it is allowed.” But, widespread corruption has prevented them enforcing it – so, WE need to.
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Elements of the crime
The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation. The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide.
The popular understanding of what constitutes genocide tends to be broader than the content of the norm under international law. Article II of the Genocide Convention contains a narrow definition of the crime of genocide, which includes two main elements:
A mental element: the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”; and
A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
Killing members of the group
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
SOCIAL MURDER
Friedrich Engels
The term “social murder” was first introduced by Friedrich Engels in his 1845 work The Condition of the Working-Class in England with regard to the English city of Manchester in the Victorian era. Engels used the term after describing how societal conditions such as poverty, poor housing, and dangerous working conditions have resulted in avoidableexcess mortality among the working class.
According to Engels, this type of death was in a different category to murder and manslaughter committed by individuals against one another, as social murder explicitly was committed by the political and social elite against the poorest in society.[1]
When one individual inflicts bodily injury upon another such that death results, we call the deed manslaughter; when the assailant knew in advance that the injury would be fatal, we call his deed murder. But when society places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death, […] knows that these thousands of victims must perish, and yet permits these conditions to remain, its deed is murder just as surely as the deed of the single individual; disguised, malicious murder, murder against which none can defend himself, which does not seem what it is, because no man sees the murderer, because the death of the victim seems a natural one, since the offence is more one of omission than of commission. But murder it remains.[1]
17/01/26 They believe that because they have corrupted every authority, & by altering & introducing new laws, falsifying data & destroying evidence – this will ensure they avoid accountability. Their premeditated actions to destroy the UK & its population from the inside; have been well documented over many years. They are the main enemy of the people and do not have a legal or moral leg to stand on. As judicial process is currently, unfit for purpose; the innocent public have been forced into the situation whereby WE have to mobilise; to protect ourselves, each other, and Great Britain – to reclaim our lives. It is in the public interest and that is what matters the most.
“A businessman cheated a council out of tens of millions of pounds and went on a spending spree with the cash, an investigation has discovered. Leaked documents reveal how Liam Kavanagh used Thurrock Council’s money to buy luxury goods, including a yacht and a private jet. The council has been made effectively bankrupt after investing £655m in Mr Kavanagh’s solar farm business.
“An email Mr Kavanagh sent in 2020 suggests he always planned to spend council cash on himself. It says: “These funds… will be used to create a new family investment office and to create wealth for years to come. This has always been my plan.”
“Mr Kavanagh’s lawyers say all the payments were permissible. They say they were approved by his company’s finance team and auditor.”
As I have said many times before, its all contracts/ misappropriated money for ‘friends of govt’ whilst they are laughing at us for paying them taxes to be used to commit crimes…
“UK Digital ID “Scrapped”? Starmer’s U-Turn Is a Lie. Here’s Where £210 Million of Your Money Went. video by Fine Print: “The government announced they’re dropping mandatory digital ID for workers. The media called it a U-turn. A victory. Case closed. Except they didn’t cancel anything. They’re still building Gov.uk One Login. Still rolling out Gov.uk Wallet. Still handing hundreds of millions in contracts to Deloitte, Accenture, and private verification companies you’ve never heard of. In this video, I follow the money behind Britain’s digital ID programme — the £100 million consulting bonanza, the revolving door between Whitehall and contractors, the 500,000 security vulnerabilities nobody fixed, and the international playbook that shows exactly where “optional” digital ID leads. They told you it was cancelled. Here’s the fine print.” 🔽
The public’s data has never been more insecure than it is today; due to how it has been scattered everywhere by the authorities who do not give a toss. Think about it, even the police now recruit persons with criminal records. Our Data is very valuable to them all and why they are happy to violate our rights.
Q. When is the law not the law? A. When those who are supposed to be upholding the law in the public interest and for national security; are too busy breaking/abusing it themselves, whilst THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER FALSE PRETENCES.
Examples: The decision makers in the UK government [& their enablers & enforcers] , colluding with many equally unscrupulous, global leaders, created an open door policy to invite and reward illegal immigrants. The police, have an open door policy too, and invited criminals to work for them. The incentivised corrupt lawyers/courtsstitched up concerned citizens; who spoke up to protect their family, friends & communities; by punishing them; and or sending many to prison. The prison serviceroutinelyrelease many criminals, including those who commit the most heinous of crimes.
They fail to protect, but instead choose to promote; the Human Right Abuses & Crimes Against Humanity; by attacking the general public; whilst stealing money from the public purse to fiercely defend and reward themselves and other criminals. The public purse is being ‘plundered’ to pay for our own downfall:
Examples include: Fear is a powerful tool used in psychological operations (Psyops); by threatening & intimidating people: causing divisions between groups, using false narratives; including during the Covid pandemic with engineered viruses, mandating vaccines by threatening removal of incomes, access to healthcare, ability to travel; & by causing the economy to collapse, destroying business and employment opportunities; pushing the masses into poverty, & by forcing digital currencies, digital ID, prioritising laws (e.g. alleged Hate Crime incidents) to silence dissent and for the state perpetrators & co to avoid accountability; & many other methods which those with nefarious intentions rely on;to use as instruments of control.They have only ever been interested in using us to exploit and abuse. Many more examples can be found throughout this website & elsewhere… The vicious cycle of abuse; tactics by narcissists & psychopaths and everyone in-between: first they idealise, then they devalue & then they discard. Ask the veterans, or those genuine professionals who lost their jobs.
[16/01/26 Yesterday, I posted the above image and the passage about Fear (my comments), on the 4 Stages of Ideological Subversion; beneath the matching links, and today when I looked at this page, the image & passage had been pushed down the page, rather like when some comments/subscription numbers are tampered with on YouTube videos etc. I printed my page it so I have the original page. I have corrected it, but the image had also been removed from its recent position in my media box , which also infers inside access❗❗❗ I have long suspected; they are shadow banning me, and the corrupt techy persons (more traitors), employed/instructed by the criminals in govt, have interfered (illegally; to cover up their corruption) on my website. My pages become very glitchy with many anomalies – I have pointed this out several times on other pages.]
Our fake leaders are the cause & effect of all the manufactured crises including the wars they desperately want – to wipe out the majority of us. It also helps them avoid accountability as they will go into hiding and leave us to defend ourselves. Then the ‘one world bank‘ [PROBABLY BLACKROCK] will jump in afterwards to pretend to be the hero – to direct money into the countries, and they will step up the exploitation & elimination of the poorest (the majority), all over again. Do not forget the WEF mantras; (1.) YOU WILL OWN NOTHING BUT WILL BE HAPPY,meaning you will be either dead or become their slaves. Why do you think they are pushing us all into absolute poverty and forcing us to be totally dependent on the psycho criminals in charge❓ This is the (2) NEW NORMAL they planned for us, whilst they all become even wealthier and more powerful. The kids & grandchildren will suffer the most ifWEdo not join together en masse and peacefully march them out of office & lock them up for good; TO STOP THEM. It US or THEM.
Conscription is being debated by our delusional, fake leaders. They believe that after exploiting & abusing us – from the ‘cradle to the grave’, that we would fight the wars they deliberately provokedand are forcing upon us. This will be the tipping point for defending ourselves from the real enemy within , as any rational person would realise that if the public are expected to be fighting any kind of war then it will be against those in positions of power who have already committed decades of atrocities & acts of terrorism against it’s own citizens in the UK. ENOUGH really is ENOUGH❗
When toxic (Dark Triad) personality types are given powerful positions, it is always dangerous for the public en masse. Then there are the sadists; The Dark Tetrad.
It is not just the UK govt who adopt & engage in these highly unethical, downright criminal [deeply corrupt] behaviours; but the Scottish government also play a significant role within the Serious Organised Crime network. And, let us not forget the global connections e.g. Pseudo regulators, WEF, WHO, UN, other NGOs etc
THE PUBLIC NEED TO HAVE THE LAST LAUGH!
We know the laughing policemen, do not uphold the law,
they let the SNP off the hook, so they can corrupt some more.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Wooh Ha Ha Ha Ha ….
The CPS defend them, no court will hear a case.
They all protect and promote each other, it is an absolute disgrace.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Wooh Ha Ha Ha Ha ….
THE PUBLIC MUST HAVE THE LAST LAUGH, AND DRAG THEM OFF TO JAILS.
👍👍👍We have more right to protect ourselves, when the justice system fails.💪💪💪
🤣🤣🤣Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Wooh Ha Ha Ha Ha ….Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Wooh Ha Ha Ha Ha …🤣🤣🤣
(…adapted from The Laughing Song by George W. Johnson / and later version: The Laughing Policeman by Charles Penrose).
THE GOOD PEOPLE OF THE UK NEED TO BE JUDGE, JURY AND PROTECTORS OF SECURITY – ALL IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
“Abuse of Position (including Embezzlement) – Occupies a position in which they are expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person, dishonestly abuses that position and intends, by means of the abuse of that position to make a gain for themselves or another or to cause loss to another or to expose another to risk of loss.
A person may be regarded as having abused their position even though their conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act…”
“Misconduct in public office (“MiPO”) is a common law offence that can be tried only on indictment. It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The offence concerns serious wilful abuse or neglect of the power or responsibilities of the public office held. There must be a direct link between the misconduct and an abuse of those powers or responsibilities. The Court of Appeal has made it clear that the offence should be strictly confined, and it can raise complex and sometimes sensitive issues.
This guidance sets out the key legal elements of the offence and the factors that prosecutors should consider when applying the Code for Crown Prosecutors in cases where MiPO is alleged. Where a case concerns a police officer, prosecutors should also consider the statutory offence of police corruption contrary to section 26 Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015″.
elected officials (MPs, councillors, ministers, mayors)
civil servants (including local authority officers and DVLA employees)
prison staff (including prison nurses and those employed by private companies operating prisons)
army officers
Bishops of the Church of England (Ball [2015] Unreported)
volunteer members of the Independent Monitoring Board (Belton [2010] EWCA Crim 2857
…as greater powers have been given to regulators and the other so called checks and balances etc, they too need to be considered as public officers; especially as they prop up those in power who they know break laws and cause massive harm; because complicit – means culpable.
